- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,206
- Location
- London
There is quite a spread between the titan/780/780ti results. Looks like a fair bit of tweaking going on and perhaps a bit of pebcak with a few results.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread**
- Thread starter Uncle Petey
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,224
I think the ti would be faster
Not by much looking at greg's score and his clocks compared to the ti above. Greg was using a slightly newer driver which is maybe giving a slight performance increase.
.
Last edited:
I had my CPU at 5Ghz, which gave the extra. I wouldn't have thought it would have any impact from 4.625Ghz but it gave me an extra 2 fps.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,224
Surprised at that but yea would then give the extra 3-4 fps that you would expect from the ti had the clocks been the same.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,884
- Location
- Surrey
Will give this another run when under water 
Which at this rate with the weather won't be long. Lol..
Which at this rate with the weather won't be long. Lol..
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,206
- Location
- London
2600K @5ghz
7970CF @1250/1800
13.11 b9.5
I'll update at some point tomorrow fellas. It's been a bench frenzy and I'm spent
7970CF @1250/1800
13.11 b9.5
I'll update at some point tomorrow fellas. It's been a bench frenzy and I'm spent
2600K @5ghz
7970CF @1250/1800
13.11 b9.5
I'll update at some point tomorrow fellas. It's been a bench frenzy and I'm spent
I'm having some problems with Tomb Raider Petey. According to my calculations im missing about 5-10fps and can't figure out why. At stock im getting 107fps roughly. Looking at the leaderboard though i should be around 114-117. Not sure if its a 13.12 WHQL issue or something else.
Will keep tweaking to see if i can figure out why im missing a few fps but for now...
290 crossfire@stock
[email protected]
290@975/1250
13.12 WHQL
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,206
- Location
- London
It can be a bit of a finicky one. I had a bit of hassle getting scores to roughly where they should be with both 7990 and 7970's.
I'm sure you'll work it out in the end
I'm sure you'll work it out in the end
Still think im missing fps from this benchmark. Plenty more in the tank though so i will be back to improve on this at a later date.
[email protected]
290 Pro Crossfire@1100/1400
13.12 WHQL
[email protected]
290 Pro Crossfire@1100/1400
13.12 WHQL
I'll be back to try and beat pgi's score at a later date. Might have a bit more wiggle room with my psu on this game.
[email protected]
290 Pro Crossfire@1175/1500
13.12 WHQL
[email protected]
290 Pro Crossfire@1175/1500
13.12 WHQL
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,884
- Location
- Surrey
I'm such a ****.
I ran this up last night and was getting consistant 85.5 thinking "nope, already got that."
On checking this it appears I was 10FPS out. Looks like I'll be taking top spot later
I ran this up last night and was getting consistant 85.5 thinking "nope, already got that."
On checking this it appears I was 10FPS out. Looks like I'll be taking top spot later
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,884
- Location
- Surrey
Sorry Greggers 
(I know it's only a match but your run proved costly lol)
Barely breaking a sweat at 1.212v
780 Ti Ref SC 1305Mhz / 3900mhz (Water)
4960X@ 4.7Ghz
331.93
Win 8.1
84.3 FPS
(I know it's only a match but your run proved costly lol)
Barely breaking a sweat at 1.212v
780 Ti Ref SC 1305Mhz / 3900mhz (Water)
4960X@ 4.7Ghz
331.93
Win 8.1
84.3 FPS
but I still expect you to beat it.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,884
- Location
- Surrey
...
brb
brb
- Status