• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread**

Status
Not open for further replies.
New run @ 4K also

3 290's @ 1030/1250
i7 5930K @ 3.8
14.7 drivers

xmGe09Rl.jpg
 
980 on air @ 1080p
clocks are 1550/1850 ish (still learning how to read the boost clocks).
Windows 8.1
3930k @ 5ghz

88.1 fps.

 
Uncle Petey said:
Could you rephrase the question?

Don't think many would call it dodgy, but each to their own. Perfect and utterly realistic, no.
Click to expand...

Perfectly straight forward reading question. As for the realism, it's hardly realistic, it's just better than the defaults, at the cost of a rather nifty FPS loss imo.
 
Last edited:
Compared to the standard hair modelling in this game (check any scene with other characters in it), it's excellent.

If you're finding it impacts performance too much for you, then I guess you can just turn it off seeing as it doesn't look very good to you anyway.
 
Yes and I've said that it looks better than the defaults lol? I'm not asking whether you like it or not. I'm asking why does it kill FPS so much?
 
Last edited:
Oh, so you can tell us all about how you think it looks 'dodgy/iffy' but I can't say that I think it looks pretty good because it's not what you're asking? Ok then...

Why does it kill fps so much? I don't know, perhaps you should ask AMD and get them to explain the tech in detail?
 
I can tell you my opinion, which I did, it was neither directed at you or anyone else. Are you actually getting offended over Lara Croft's hair? :p

Maybe I'll get a more suitable reply from somebody else. Thanks for your input though :)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom