Guy "tags" (spraypaints) airforce 1

Marc Ecko Enterprises does not condone illegal activity, acts of vandalism, or the destruction of other people's property. We do, however, advocate freedom of expression, graffiti as a recognized art form and the protection of consumer rights regardless of age, race, religion or political affiliation.

LOL! :rolleyes:
 
Technically he didnt. Its only Air Force One when the president is onboard.

This was most obvious when Nixon resigned onboard, and the flight had to change its call sign mid-journey.

[/pedantry]
 
So the guy graffiti's his web address on the side of Air Force One, then gloats about it on said website, and expects to get off scot free? Won't the FBI be knocking on his door soon? :p
 
Surely it could be any of the old Boeings used as Air Force One or many of the fake Air Force One's used in shows? Like the West Wing etc. (I presume they dont use the real one...)

I think everybody wants it to be true, but i doubt it is.
 
I just think it's highly unlikey he managed to tag the personal plane of the President of the United States.

There are several planes in the same livery as that, not neccessarily Air Force One.

I do think it is highly unlikely to get near that plane withought getting whacked by Secret Service goons or whatever. I am not saying never, but I find it hard to believe.
 
Von Smallhausen said:
I just think it's highly unlikey he managed to tag the personal plane of the President of the United States.

There are several planes in the same livery as that, not neccessarily Air Force One.

I just think it is highly unlikely to get near that plane withought getting whacked by Secret Service goons or whatever. I am not saying never, but I find it hard to believe.

He didn't tag 'Air Force One' as the president was most definetly not aboard. However, from the video it seem pretty convincing that he did tag a plane in the Air Force One liverary.

I can't seem to find any news articles though :confused:

Burnsy
 
burnsy2023 said:
He didn't tag 'Air Force One' as the president was most definetly not aboard. However, from the video it seem pretty convincing that he did tag a plane in the Air Force One liverary.

I can't seem to find any news articles though :confused:

Burnsy

I agree, but for the run about of the President it seemed pretty spectatcularly unguarded.

I can just see Al Qaeda flocking to Charlie Brown's for spray paint now.
 
Same here.

There are two aircraft of identical configurations and they are both housed in a hanger, they dont sit out on the tarmac unless they are away waiting to move.

Also the security these planes have is extreme, this isnt some bogus security firm, they have snipers covering a perimeter of about a mile when possible, guards on the ground with dogs, and all armed. Im not denying its possible, but I would trust that anyone successful in tagging one of these aircraft would probably have been shot seconds later.

If its a real occurence I would go with the theory its not the actual Presidential jet, but either a museum piece or possibly a film set.
 
Warspite said:
Same here.

There are two aircraft of identical configurations and they are both housed in a hanger, they dont sit out on the tarmac unless they are away waiting to move.

Also the security these planes have is extreme, this isnt some bogus security firm, they have snipers covering a perimeter of about a mile when possible, guards on the ground with dogs, and all armed. Im not denying its possible, but I would trust that anyone successful in tagging one of these aircraft would probably have been shot seconds later.

If its a real occurence I would go with the theory its not the actual Presidential jet, but either a museum piece or possibly a film set.


OMG!!!111oneoneone THEY HAVE GUNS made out of BOMBS LOLLAPALLOZAEeleven
 
Back
Top Bottom