NUCLEARUS BENCHMARK :)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Associate
Joined
19 Jan 2003
Posts
2,495
Location
west sussex
hi jokester

heres some scores from XS world record looks like 28680 but its a non consistant score. according to this iam 3rd but iam not holding my breath lol

01.....Jaan - QX6700 @ 4.705GHz - 28,680 - TOP INTEL & TOP CPU SO FAR - HIGHEST SCORE TO DATE
..........02.....dj883u2 - QX6700 @ 3.810GHz - 24,267
..........03.....Z3R0-CooL - QX6700 @ 3.500GHz - 22,139
..........04.....NapalmV5 - QX6700 @ 4.400GHz - 22,092
..........05.....Bootup05 - Q6600 @ 3.279GHz - 22,458
..........06.....Kunaak - Q6600 @ 3.600GHz - 22,062
..........07.....Spacemaster - XEON X3220's @ 4.250GHz - 20,073
..........08.....tomb18 - QX6700 @ 3.499GHz - 18,414
..........09.....Dualist - XEON 5320's @ 2.522GHz - 17,987
..........10.....Kunaak - XEON 3210's @ 3.599GHz - 17,955


and i think this bench does have a few bugs!!!!! i have repeated the test 4 times now and have varied scores ranging from 18500 to 23000 odd without changing any settings what so ever. why this is i have no idea. but i belive you are right jokester as it should read within a few points each time its run.


oh well 3rd with a buggy bench lol :rolleyes:
 
Associate
Joined
17 May 2006
Posts
1,189
Location
Manchester, UK
A slight improvement for me, doesn't bump me up a place but it seems to be the best I can get with this CPU.

10x233_4025.jpg
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,319
Location
Aberdeenshire
vapor matt said:
and i think this bench does have a few bugs!!!!!

Are you able to post a screenie with a similar high score in that Prime test, the guy that created it wants some extra info to see if he can fix it.

A lot of those other scores were done with the 1.5 version which used different tests and generally gave about 10% higher scores clock for clock than the 2.0 version.

Jokester
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jan 2003
Posts
2,495
Location
west sussex
I will run some more after the GP and get some shots for you. you can run it 4 times and then you get a high one. it is strange or should i just claim the WR lol



will run some more later and get some screens
 
Associate
Joined
15 Jan 2007
Posts
689
on the subject of wierdness, i seem to have curiously (and consitently) high brute-force single core scores for X2 Cores. im assuming its related to ddr1/L2 latency...
 
Associate
Joined
10 May 2007
Posts
655
Location
Telford
I've boosted my score again and managed to break the 7k barrier!! :D Gettin a bit scared with the overclocking.....Must be quite near to what the 3800 can do on air i think. Temps ok tho.....

 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
15 Jan 2007
Posts
689
broke 8500 with cpu @ 3216mhz (268*12 @ 1.65 @48/42 loaded temps), ram at 3-3-3-0-1T (it works....)

but i was using paint for screenshots and messed it up :'(

gonna have to wait for water to cool again before i can get a validation on the score. - about 8200mb/s in everest for read/write :p
 
Associate
Joined
17 May 2006
Posts
1,189
Location
Manchester, UK
Bought an A64 4000 for £40 new.

Abit AN8 Ultra
Kingmax 3200 RAM

Multiplier = 12
FSB = 248

Not touched the HTT speed yet or increased any voltages. Back on top of the single core table :D

12x248_5149.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom