i5 2500k OC result

Associate
Joined
2 Aug 2011
Posts
1,147
Location
Newbury
Been on prime for 30mins, mainly testing the temps.

4.4ghz @ 1.31v

these temps seem ok? Not sure if they are correct temps as my past AMD rigs, software was like 8-10c off I was told.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2026951

test1.jpg
 
They seem a little high for a H100, but relatively speaking those temps are perfectly fine.

As a comparison I'm running 4.5 at 1.35v with temps reaching a maximum of about 60-62C
 
Lol now is the wrong time to be comparing temps vs past temps this weather normally means at least +8c on everything
 
I've not tried, last time I entered the bios and fiddled around, it wouldnt boot again lol. Plus I have no idea how to. Pretty sure with the cooling I have, I could hit 4.8..considering its (at the moment) 19c outside, my cpu is running at around 32c with browser, spotify running.
 
+1 for version 2.52, tried it earlier and hit 90degs! 2.50 only hit mid 70's. GFlops went from 60 to 122 tho :) (using 9000MB)

You might be interested to know, that's because 2.52 supports AVX, which means 8 (instead of 4) operations may be performed per clock cycle, giving you twice as many operations and a higher intensity stress test and temp :)
 
Im currently running the intel burn test, very concerned about the Gflops....temps im happy with? will post results when its done 10 times (then move on to 20 etc)
 
What should I do then Stu? Its annoying my cpu-z and realtemp dont seem to pick up on voltage etc, despite installing twice.
 
Ignore the Gflops.

Your test is also custom so I cant do a comparison.

Not sure if serious. Come on stulid have you not read any of my posts on this topic?

The GFLOPS is a measure of the intensity of the stress test, which increases with the problem size (memory usage). One must use enough memory to achieve sufficiently high GFLOPS. My rule of thumb is 80% of peak.

In this chaps case, he wants to be seeing at least 0.8*32*4.4 = 113 GFLOPS.

The number you're getting is around half that, which means one of two things. Either it's not using AVX, however this is unlikely as you're using win7 and IBT v2.52. Therefore, this discrepancy is because you only used "standard" level memory of 1 GB.

The standard profile is way out of date these days with 8 GB systems. Essentially by only giving it 1 GB memory you're choking it and it's not stressing fully.

I suggest running 5 or 10 loops at 4 GB memory usage. You'll probably see higher temps, as it's FAR more stressful.

There are loads of claims of IBT not showing instability, but really the fault is with the user, and thus with the programmer for not releasing documentation/an smarter interface.
 
Hi Joey, the reason I wasnt happy with gflops is due to seeing some of your posts. However the test was for 4.6ghz (updating sig when stable) but im annoyed its 1.39v although My bios says 1.35 :/

updated memory in bios from 1333 auto to 1600 which is what my ram is.
 
Back
Top Bottom