Pikas: Cuteness Aletr

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,742
Pikas: Cuteness Alert

Finally got around to uploading some photos from a trip to Canada last year.
Of the many animals you can find in the Canadian Rockies the Pika is definitely one of the cutest. They also make good target species for photogs on vacation, presenting enough of a challenge in locating and getting close to, but not as impossible as animals like Moose. I had under 2 weeks in the Rockies between Jasper and Banff, and most mornings involved getting up at 5-6am and getting to a trailhead for first light, a few hours of trekking brings you into the alpine bowls, where the chirping of pikas can be heard to echo distantly. Staring across boulder field your eyes tend to struggle to focus on where the sounds come from. When something does move, more often than not it is aground squirrel (cute but too tame to be interesting wildlife photography).

Pikas will definitely spot you before you spot them. Their first reaction is to freeze so they give no motion clues. If you find them (can take sometime using binoculars) then you need to slowly creep up on them. Very slowly. Over large boulders and loose rocks. Just as they come to significantly fill the frame they will run for cover, so try its time to again. They will re-appear within 15 minutes, so if you get a few meters closer and wait it out you may be in with a chance, but they are clever and have sharp eyes.

The patience pays of though. repeating these early starts and the patient waiting can get you within some tens of meters. On one of the last days this was enough for 300mm lens on a crop body.


The processing is rushed but the RAW files nice and sharp with plenty of details for future PP, almost no cropping. All shot with a D90 and 70-300 VR, a perfect travel and hiking setup for wildlife (some hike were over 8-10 hours, 4-6000 feet of climbing so the 70-300 was about as heavy as I wanted to go, some very visible CA is the only downside, sharpness is as good as my 70-200 2.8)).

4952042170_793edd9992_b.jpg


4952043254_de481f9218_b.jpg


4951450371_3e14bcea5c_b.jpg



They make a wonderful loud squeak, here is a pika squeaking its lungs out:
4951451339_c707f0d1ea_b.jpg


My GF loves B&W, so I made this one for her
4951450037_43893d4bc2_b.jpg



Ground squirrels however are far simpler to photograph, indeed they will come up to you and pester you. Don't leave a backpack with food in it lying around or you will return with holes in it:(
4952043560_e18a7782f1_b.jpg



Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Firstly, is this what they named Pikachu after?!

And love the photos, very cute! 2nd is the best :D
 
I am presuming its the Nikon one which is about £400 new? Whilst I am yet to buy a zoom as never needed one I certainly would be looking at that one. For the money thats very impressive. I love the Squirrels.
 
I am presuming its the Nikon one which is about £400 new? Whilst I am yet to buy a zoom as never needed one I certainly would be looking at that one. For the money thats very impressive. I love the Squirrels.

Yes, Nikon 70-300 VR 4.5-5.6

From 70-200 it is just as sharp as the 70-200 2.8 VR I. It is still very sharp until about 270mm, then fades slowly. Stopping down to f78 brings back critical sharpness.
Focus is fast and accurate, not 2.8 fast, but fast enough for this kind of wildlife.


Chromatic aberration is moderate, fixable in PP. There is no vignetting or distortion to be concerned with. The VR is effect, but makes the Bokeh a little edgy as expected.

The only thing you really give up is the speed. 5.6 is quite slow compared to 2.8, but that is the trade-off in size and weight. Seems like Canon finally have the idea and will produce a similar lens but with a crazy street price.
 
Yes, Nikon 70-300 VR 4.5-5.6

From 70-200 it is just as sharp as the 70-200 2.8 VR I. It is still very sharp until about 270mm, then fades slowly. Stopping down to f78 brings back critical sharpness.
Focus is fast and accurate, not 2.8 fast, but fast enough for this kind of wildlife.


Chromatic aberration is moderate, fixable in PP. There is no vignetting or distortion to be concerned with. The VR is effect, but makes the Bokeh a little edgy as expected.

The only thing you really give up is the speed. 5.6 is quite slow compared to 2.8, but that is the trade-off in size and weight. Seems like Canon finally have the idea and will produce a similar lens but with a crazy street price.

That's interesting to know, thanks. I have a mate who has a 70-300 DG APO and has been looking to upgrade. I originally recommended the 70-200 because of the speed, but it does come at a price. This is a nice half way measure which would suit him perfectly. I am also tempted myself. :)
 
I know, not scary at all.

Funnily enough, the GF and me were sat having lunch watching giant ice seracs fall off a glacier over a 600m cliff above the plain of 6 glaciers, lake Louise. All of a sudden my GF was attacked by a squirrel who chumped down on her fingers, she jumped up and swung her arm around with the squirrel still attached like something out of monthy python. A few seconds of frantic arm swinging and the critter got thrown clear a good 10m away.

No serious injury but due to the various minor diseases they often carry, such as rabies and the bubonic plague, a trip to the hospital was required and $800 worth of vaccines with bi-weekly trips to the GP for 4 months.
 
That's interesting to know, thanks. I have a mate who has a 70-300 DG APO and has been looking to upgrade. I originally recommended the 70-200 because of the speed, but it does come at a price. This is a nice half way measure which would suit him perfectly. I am also tempted myself. :)

I have the 70-200 2.8, the plan was to sell the 70-300 to help fund it. But I just can't bring myself since the lens performs so well and is so light and compact (but still sturdy).

apparently it performs even better on full frame.
 
Back
Top Bottom