17 Jul 2006 at 20:35 #1 Devious Devious Soldato Joined 29 Dec 2003 Posts 4,052 Location UK Seems theres not much in it really. Im glad i kept my cheaper Team Group 667 @ 423 Mhz http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/core_2_memory_tuning
Seems theres not much in it really. Im glad i kept my cheaper Team Group 667 @ 423 Mhz http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/core_2_memory_tuning
18 Jul 2006 at 11:58 #2 Dutch Guy Dutch Guy Soldato Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 24,560 Location Amsterdam,The Netherlands I saw that too, it looks like it's the same story as the AMD systems, it makes a difference but it's single digit differences. It does make a difference but IMO it isn't worth it getting DDR2-1067 over DDR2-667 looking at the price difference. Maybe the difference becomes bigger when overclocked?
I saw that too, it looks like it's the same story as the AMD systems, it makes a difference but it's single digit differences. It does make a difference but IMO it isn't worth it getting DDR2-1067 over DDR2-667 looking at the price difference. Maybe the difference becomes bigger when overclocked?
18 Jul 2006 at 12:09 #3 Devious Devious Soldato OP Joined 29 Dec 2003 Posts 4,052 Location UK Ive not seen many many overclock 1066 higher but have seen lower spec overclock to 1066
19 Jul 2006 at 09:06 #4 Dutch Guy Dutch Guy Soldato Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 24,560 Location Amsterdam,The Netherlands Another article comparing 3-3-3-9 timings to 4-4-4-12 and 5-5-5-15 timings and there isn't a big difference at all much like AMD systems. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/07/18/core_2_duo_memory_timings/1.html
Another article comparing 3-3-3-9 timings to 4-4-4-12 and 5-5-5-15 timings and there isn't a big difference at all much like AMD systems. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/07/18/core_2_duo_memory_timings/1.html