Rant: Correct use of the magical ' !

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
7,175
Location
Sussex
I dont know if it is just me, but more and more recently i've seen the apostrophe being misused in thread after thread!

for example

* "FAO Swindoner's"
* "Who run's their own business"
* "Turbo's"
* "Views on MR2's"
* "Oz Chrono's"

I don't know if the stress of work is finally getting to me but PLEASE - sort it out!
 
I am pretty good with my apostrophe most of the time... but tell me, what is wrong with "Views on MR2's"?

MR2's, 1960's, CPU's, NPC's

Some common examples there... which can be found in all sorts of print media. Are you saying they're all wrong?

SiriusB
 
Last edited:
SiriusB said:
I am pretty good with my apostraphe most of the time... but tell me, what is wrong with "Views on MR2's"?

MR2's, 1960's, CPU's, NPC's

Some common examples there... which can be found in all sorts of print media. Are you saying they're all wrong?

SiriusB

yep, apostrophe is for posession e.g. Dan's, or to mark where letters have been left out e.g. doesn't (does not)

edit also:

1960s
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from 1960's)
 
Last edited:
SiriusB said:
I am pretty good with my apostrophe most of the time... but tell me, what is wrong with "Views on MR2's"?

MR2's, 1960's, CPU's, NPC's

Some common examples there... which can be found in all sorts of print media. Are you saying they're all wrong?

SiriusB

Lots of people are okay with that, but I personally dislike it - it's ambiguous and unnecessary. "MR2s", "1960s", "CPUs" and "NPCs" are all perfectly clear, and make it clear that you're talking about the plural and not something belonging to MR2 - take the following sentence, for example:

MI5's primary role is intelligence gathering.

In this instance, the apostrophe was possessive but in your usage it's not that clear.
 
robmiller said:
Lots of people are okay with that, but I personally dislike it - it's ambiguous and unnecessary. "MR2s", "1960s", "CPUs" and "NPCs" are all perfectly clear, and make it clear that you're talking about the plural and not something belonging to MR2 - take the following sentence, for example:

MI5's primary role is intelligence gathering.

In this instance, the apostrophe was possessive but in your usage it's not that clear.

I have just had a quick read and now I know the apostophe has only two uses in English. I just found it strange that my example is something you see in many many places.

But anyhoo, I now know better and shall endevour to never repeat my mistake again.... probably.

SiriusB
 
just for the op:

sorry.jpg


dont flame me - I know it's not funny :(
 
Back
Top Bottom