content management systems

Could try some of the big ones like joomla, mambo.
Also heard good things about community server but that needs asp I think.
 
I'm using textpattern on a website I'm making at the minute and it's been pretty easy to pick up. I've found it quite flexible and easy to alter to meet my needs, as well being very easy to intergrate it into the template I made.

You could also use wordpress or joomla.
 
For someone as inept at coding as I am, the concept of a pre-packed site that expands and self-installs when you add water, is great. They all have good points and bad. If you opt for one of the open source offerings, then you pay for what you get, obviously. You actually get quite a lot in my opinion but if you come up against a technical issue that requires the assistance of someone more knowledgeable in the inner workings of your chosen CMS, the response is patchy at best.

I started with PostNuke and found it ok with huge amounts of plugin modules for expanding it's capabilities. Given my limited needs at the time, I rarely experienced major problems and so hardly required help from the 'support' community.

phpNuke evolved from PN and is said to be far more secure and application. Again, a multitude of modules means you can expand the function of your site. There are numerous communities that offer support forums but it was my experience that they were not particularly commited to helping. The attitude I particularly remember was 'everything you need to know is in the documentaion' when it clearly wasn't.

Xoops is another CMS and I've been using it for several months on a number of sites (see www.largefamilies.co.uk for an example). There aren't as many modules it seems but more than enough to satisfy my needs. It's a doddle to install and maintain and up to now has had fewer problems than it's Nuke competitors. Given it's apparently robust nature, I seldom need to ask the 'support' community for assistance. Sadly, when I am unable to solve the problem myself, I am forced to ask and seldom get a response or it might take several weeks before seeing a reply. Perhaps it's just the way I ask, I don't know but there are many questions from others that go without a reply. If it wasn't for the fact that I have learnt a little of the inner workings and foibles Xoops, I might have given up and tried another. I really like Xoops but loath the day I need to ask for help. I've received no help and wrong help, both of which result in wiping and starting from scratch, which is no big deal unless you have loads of members or lots of content.

I tried Mambo but after several attempts to install a forum I gave up.

At the end of the day, if I had money I would go for one that had a professional support option. If not, don't use an open source CMS for anything critical.
 
Depends what you want in a CMS. If you're mainly focusing on content, then something like TextPattern or WordPress will probably be best; if you want a full-blown portal then you'll probably want to look at Drupal or Mambo/Joomla.
 
robmiller said:
Depends what you want in a CMS. If you're mainly focusing on content, then something like TextPattern or WordPress will probably be best; if you want a full-blown portal then you'll probably want to look at Drupal or Mambo/Joomla.

Yup! Joomla is a good 'out of the box' solution. Drupal is (dare I say it) better coded/nicer markup, but takes a little more getting used to.
 
We use Documentum WebPublisher.

Cons:
Expensive
Convoluted
1000s of features no-one will ever use

Con & Pro:
Requires extensive XSLT skills, not just xml -> xhtml, but xml -> .aspx, .cs etc etc. This is a piece of software that lets you write not just web-pages, but whole sections of code on the fly.

Pros:
HUGELY Powerful
Flexible

I really wouldn't recommend it unless you look after 15+ websites and need full compliance level auditing. To put it in context, it's just taken a team of 4 full-time web developers 6 months to put one site together, and in-total my team look after about 30 sites - that's a HUGE amount of effort. Having said that, the sites now maintain themselves - users with no web dev knowledge at all can create new sections/templates on the sites with minimal training, etc etc...
 
Mr^B said:
We use Documentum WebPublisher.

Cons:
Expensive
Convoluted
1000s of features no-one will ever use

Con & Pro:
Requires extensive XSLT skills, not just xml -> xhtml, but xml -> .aspx, .cs etc etc. This is a piece of software that lets you write not just web-pages, but whole sections of code on the fly.

Pros:
HUGELY Powerful
Flexible

I really wouldn't recommend it unless you look after 15+ websites and need full compliance level auditing. To put it in context, it's just taken a team of 4 full-time web developers 6 months to put one site together, and in-total my team look after about 30 sites - that's a HUGE amount of effort. Having said that, the sites now maintain themselves - users with no web dev knowledge at all can create new sections/templates on the sites with minimal training, etc etc...

useful info. thanks.

this sounds like way too much ... but I may have to do a CMS type website for a client soon.

might be a joomla-customisation job in the end.
 
Back
Top Bottom