Is the Vista firewall any good?

Associate
Joined
24 May 2003
Posts
1,429
Location
UK
I know that the Vista firewall is now bi-directional but I'm just wondering if I would be better off with a third party firewall instead?

When I was on XP I used to use a third party firewall (I've forgotten what it was called now :o ) but this wasn't compatible with Vista so I had to ditch it.

What I find strange is that I never get alerts that a certain program wishes to access the internet so I'm wondering how effective the Vista firewall really is :confused:

Any recommendations for the 64-bit version of Vista Home Premium please?
 
Does your PC sit behind a router or are you using a Modem?

If you are behind a router, configure the firewall there and dont bother with a firewall on your PC.
 
Does your PC sit behind a router or are you using a Modem?

If you are behind a router, configure the firewall there and dont bother with a firewall on your PC.
I'm using a router and a hardware firewall on a Netgear DG834GT but I don't know how to configure it so I'll have to look into it, thanks :)
 
The Vista firewall is great. It's light on resources and tightly integrated with the OS. No need to worry about regression induced BSODs from third parties tinkering with their code.

Outbound is 'allow all' by default. I've set it to 'deny all' and created 'exception' rules for programs that need access.

The lack of outbound alerts is unfortunate. Don't know what Microsoft was thinking on that one.
 
The Vista firewall is great. It's light on resources and tightly integrated with the OS. No need to worry about regression induced BSODs from third parties tinkering with their code.
Crikey, it's actually good then :eek:



Outbound is 'allow all' by default. I've set it to 'deny all' and created 'exception' rules for programs that need access.

The lack of outbound alerts is unfortunate. Don't know what Microsoft was thinking on that one.
That explains why I never get alerts :D

I'll do what you did and 'deny all' and create 'exception' rules, thanks :)
 
It acts like sygate in so far as it will notify you when a new app is trying to get internet access and you can click allow or deny, and choose either once or always. Makes life a lot easier.
 
It acts like sygate in so far as it will notify you when a new app is trying to get internet access and you can click allow or deny, and choose either once or always. Makes life a lot easier.
Thanks for the link to the Vista Firewall Control.
It works great. :)

You just reminded me of the (software) firewall that I used to use on XP but wasn't compatible with Vista - Sygate.
 
i've been using zonealarm and works very well has both inbound and outbound alerts but is also very easy to use

:eek:

I hated ZA... I used to use Outpost on XP. Not really bothered these days, Windows firewall is good to stop incoming attacks that get past the NAT in the router.

Outbound, mmm, don't have any dodgy software. Run as a standard user with UAC on full with AV software. Tend not to download "free" stuff off the internet... Tend not visit dodgy websites

No point in 3rd party firewalls these days... (I can hear the thundering footsteps of the EU.... Win7 E + NF) No Firewall.. ha ha ha
 
Thanks for the link to the Vista Firewall Control.
It works great. :)

You just reminded me of the (software) firewall that I used to use on XP but wasn't compatible with Vista - Sygate.

Did it work OK? I didn't like the site to be honest.

Besides just type in firewall [Enter] on the orb search panel. Brings you to the advanced control panel for the firewall...
 
Did it work OK?
Yes fine thanks.

34ryq0j.jpg


More firewall rules are being added as I use it more.



I didn't like the site to be honest.
It's a bit confusing but I found it okay.
 
What's the Windows Firewall (with Vista Firewall Control) like compared to Comodo on resources?

I'm not too bothered about features, as long as I am asked whether to permit/deny a program if it's trying to get on the internet.
 
What's the Windows Firewall (with Vista Firewall Control) like compared to Comodo on resources?
I don't know about Comodo as I've never used it but it's light on resources both CPU usage and RAM.

25rfqz6.jpg




I'm not too bothered about features, as long as I am asked whether to permit/deny a program if it's trying to get on the internet.
That's exactly what happens and it remembers your choices and also gives you the option of allowing permission just the one time.
 
I don't know about Comodo as I've never used it but it's light on resources both CPU usage and RAM.

--pic

That's exactly what happens and it remembers your choices and also gives you the option of allowing permission just the one time.

That's pretty light. However, if the Windows Firewall service is turned on then one of the svchost.exe processes will surely take a little more RAM/processing power?
 
That's pretty light. However, if the Windows Firewall service is turned on then one of the svchost.exe processes will surely take a little more RAM/processing power?
Yes your right but I can put up with it as I much prefer being able to easily control what applications 'phone home'
 
Back
Top Bottom