Just wanted to get people's views on how to handle "Current Salary" questions on job applications / interviews.
Lets say you apply for a job that doesn't have a fixed salary banding, and the market rate is signficantly higher than your current salary. How do you handle the question about your current salary, bearing in mind that:
a) A big differential gives them a window to offer you below market rates knowing that it still represents a significant rise for you
b) A 'low' current salary may cause them to question how much responsibility you have in your current job, whether you really are as skilled/valuable/important/experienced as you make out.
The way I see it, there are three options:
1) Tell the truth, be confident in your ability to convince them you are the right person for the job, and assume that you will be able to talk them up to a fair salary rather than risk losing you.
2) Inflate your salary to a level that is closer to what they should be paying you for the new role, and hope that if you get the job they won't bother taking any action over it if they find out (e.g. from P60).
3) Play it coy and try to deflect the question, saying it isn't relevant and that you are more interested in knowing what they think you are worth.
I've seen #3 suggested on here before but I am just not convinced, if you dodge a question I can see from their side it may raise more questions than answers.
I know people who have done #2 and it has stood them in good stead, earning them a decent pay rise. I'm a bit too straight-laced for this approach but am starting to wonder whether I should adopt it in future, since realistically once I start a job is an employer likely to want to go through the recruitment process again on the basis of a white lie on the current salary front, given that everything else is factually correct.
#1 I know can work too, some people land themselves decent (40%+) rises this way but I do have fears about how prospective employers view it, in terms of the stigma attached to a 'low' salary.
Obviously when going via an agent they can handle that side of things for you, for the most part, but I have dealt with an agent in the past who quite rigorously questioned my salary expectations vis-a-vis my current salary, which I viewed as irrelevant in relation to my competency for the job in question.
I should point out I'm not currently in the position of having to declare my salary but am interested to know for future reference should it become necessary.
Lets say you apply for a job that doesn't have a fixed salary banding, and the market rate is signficantly higher than your current salary. How do you handle the question about your current salary, bearing in mind that:
a) A big differential gives them a window to offer you below market rates knowing that it still represents a significant rise for you
b) A 'low' current salary may cause them to question how much responsibility you have in your current job, whether you really are as skilled/valuable/important/experienced as you make out.
The way I see it, there are three options:
1) Tell the truth, be confident in your ability to convince them you are the right person for the job, and assume that you will be able to talk them up to a fair salary rather than risk losing you.
2) Inflate your salary to a level that is closer to what they should be paying you for the new role, and hope that if you get the job they won't bother taking any action over it if they find out (e.g. from P60).
3) Play it coy and try to deflect the question, saying it isn't relevant and that you are more interested in knowing what they think you are worth.
I've seen #3 suggested on here before but I am just not convinced, if you dodge a question I can see from their side it may raise more questions than answers.
I know people who have done #2 and it has stood them in good stead, earning them a decent pay rise. I'm a bit too straight-laced for this approach but am starting to wonder whether I should adopt it in future, since realistically once I start a job is an employer likely to want to go through the recruitment process again on the basis of a white lie on the current salary front, given that everything else is factually correct.
#1 I know can work too, some people land themselves decent (40%+) rises this way but I do have fears about how prospective employers view it, in terms of the stigma attached to a 'low' salary.
Obviously when going via an agent they can handle that side of things for you, for the most part, but I have dealt with an agent in the past who quite rigorously questioned my salary expectations vis-a-vis my current salary, which I viewed as irrelevant in relation to my competency for the job in question.
I should point out I'm not currently in the position of having to declare my salary but am interested to know for future reference should it become necessary.