• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

EVGA GTX 680 *** 4GB

Associate
Joined
14 Dec 2010
Posts
495
...so am I right in thinking that the 4GB of RAM on these suckers might increase framerates at 2560x1600? I game on a 30", and in looking at the benches thus far it looks like the 680 seems to not be as linearly impressive at this res compared to the 7970 - do people think this is due to VRAM limitations, or more to do with architectural issues differentiating the 680 and 7970 specifically at high resolutions?

What about availability? Wonder when these are out?
 
Are the evga cards any good, how do they fair against say a asus?!
Exactly the same hardware, exactly the same warranty, and from what I can find exactly the same accessories in the box.

At the moment the the only difference is the colour of the box and stickers.
 
10 year warranty which is transferable *per card* as opposed to per person, still honour the warranty if you take the cooler off and watercool it, best software on the market for overclocking/running the 680, worlds biggest Nvidia reseller. I wouldn't buy anything Nvidia from anyone else - EVGA that is.
 
Just wondering if folks (Duff-Man, Rroff, DM - even though he's still trumpeting the red team haha) think the 4GB frame buffer on these suckers might have an effect at high res over the 2GB? Is the 256bit memory bus going to limit bandwidth with which to utilise the extra 2GB VRAM at high resolutions (2560x1600 etc)?
 
Just wondering if folks (Duff-Man, Rroff, DM - even though he's still trumpeting the red team haha) think the 4GB frame buffer on these suckers might have an effect at high res over the 2GB? Is the 256bit memory bus going to limit bandwidth with which to utilise the extra 2GB VRAM at high resolutions (2560x1600 etc)?

SNAP. You beat me to it!;)
 
I thought the issue at high res was memory bandwidth.

4GB might not help much?

Maybe due to the 256bit bus?:confused:

Seems we're saying the same thing - perhaps waiting for "Big Kepler" might be better, with its' 512bit bus...

However it's going to have more GPGPU compute abilities (it'll be the basis of the next Tesla cards) so the performance isn't going to be linearly better than GK104 I'm thinking - in games at least.

Still, be interesting to know what those who are more knowledgeable in such things think..
 
10 year warranty which is transferable *per card* as opposed to per person, still honour the warranty if you take the cooler off and watercool it, best software on the market for overclocking/running the 680, worlds biggest Nvidia reseller. I wouldn't buy anything Nvidia from anyone else - EVGA that is.

The last 3 nvidias ive bought have been asus, didnt realise evga had such an outstanding warranty - might be worth switching over! Cheers for the info
 
The last 3 nvidias ive bought have been asus, didnt realise evga had such an outstanding warranty - might be worth switching over! Cheers for the info

You need to register within 30 days to get the 10 year sucker, but it's pretty good. Without registration I think you get 3 years automatically now, when it was 2 before. Or something like that.
 
4GB is really not worth it unless you intend to game at extremely high resolutions with mult-monitors. This will obviously change in 2-3 years time, but ty then the GPU's will be struglling more than lack of VRAM anyway.

Foe 3x 2560x1600 setups, 4GB will make a difference with some games. For anything else, 2GB is fine. Kepler seems to require very little resources for high levels of AA, so it could also be much more VRAM efficient than previous 2GB cards. No reviews I have seen show big falloff's, even at very high resolutions.
 
Back
Top Bottom