Biggest ever 28nm gpu 70 types, 9 games, 3 resolutions

Zeed · 16 Feb 2016 at 11:15

I know its in Polish and all but Google translator should do the job for anyone that wants to have a look.

http://pclab.pl/art60000.html

Must have taken them AGES of benching

Gregster · 16 Feb 2016 at 12:09

Nice one Zed and always good to see mass testing on multi res.

arc@css · 16 Feb 2016 at 12:19

Wow.

LambChop · 16 Feb 2016 at 12:35

The 980Ti really is a powerhouse

Zeed · 16 Feb 2016 at 14:21

I like how its from lowest to top tier in everything sums up 28nm and good inside when after some second hand cards 2.

JediFragger · 16 Feb 2016 at 18:30

Wow, that is REALLY comprehensive!! And the 980Ti when overclocked is a beast indeed :cool:

Zeed · 16 Feb 2016 at 19:40

Think this really shows how 980ti when it came out wiped out AMD's fury dreams. Once overclocked it destroys anything amd got.

LoadsaMoney · 17 Feb 2016 at 13:54

Lord_ZED said:
Think this really shows how 980ti when it came out wiped out AMD's fury dreams. Once overclocked it destroys anything amd got.

The Fury X was already dead in the water due to its stupid pricing, as you could get the similar performing 980 way cheaper, there was no way anyone was going to pay about £200 more for the same performance, and the Ti just crapped all over its carcass when Nvidia dropped its price below it as well, as then you could have got a card that totally smashed it to bloody bits cheaper, and had more VRam as well.

Gregster · 17 Feb 2016 at 14:17

LoadsaMoney said:
The Fury X was already dead in the water due to its stupid pricing, as you could get the similar performing 980 way cheaper, there was no way anyone was going to pay about £200 more for the same performance, and the Ti just crapped all over its carcass when Nvidia dropped its price below it as well, as then you could have got a card that totally smashed it to bloody bits cheaper, and had more VRam as well.

Whilst the FX is a good card, release was a bit of a shambles and you could grab a 980Ti for cheaper as yo say and stock was non existent for the first couple of months of the FX launch.

LoadsaMoney · 17 Feb 2016 at 14:29

Gregster said:
Whilst the FX is a good card, release was a bit of a shambles and you could grab a 980Ti for cheaper as yo say and stock was non existent for the first couple of months of the FX launch.

They when they did eventually turn up, they whined like a bitch

Was a massive fail tbh.

Gregster · 17 Feb 2016 at 14:40

LoadsaMoney said:
They when they did eventually turn up, they whined like a bitch

Was a massive fail tbh.

Thankfully mine didn't

But yer, there was many that did.

LoadsaMoney · 17 Feb 2016 at 14:43

Although tbf, it was way overhyped, the TX killer etc..., so you can't really blame AMD for not delivering

Gregster · 17 Feb 2016 at 14:51

LoadsaMoney said:
Although tbf, it was way overhyped, the TX killer etc..., so you can't really blame AMD for not delivering

£100 cheaper on launch and it would have flown out but then they didn't have the stock for that either, so better to make some extra cash I guess.

LoadsaMoney · 17 Feb 2016 at 15:49

Gregster said:
£100 cheaper on launch and it would have flown out but then they didn't have the stock for that either, so better to make some extra cash I guess.

Yeah if it was cheaper and was in a good supply, would have been much better for them, and also if they allowed them to be custom cooled.

r7slayer · 17 Feb 2016 at 16:00

Fury x is a good card from what i can tell the bad things about it or was on release is it got hyped too much to be atleast on par or beating a 980Ti this wasn't the case unless your looking at 4k then it matches it most of the time. It even got claimed as a overclockers dream so most was expecting this card to overclock quite well. 50-100Mhz on the core certainly isn't great. So its quite disappointing in this regard. Then... Then the price was just ridiculous It needed to be much lower.

If they atleast had price £100 -150 lower it would have been not so bad but it wasn't so its got bad press.

The 980Ti overclocks like crazy. a lot of people getting thier cores upto 1500Mhz is crazy. Memory overclocks well too. This is what i call a over clockers dream

Kaapstad · 17 Feb 2016 at 16:30

LoadsaMoney said:
They when they did eventually turn up, they whined like a bitch

Was a massive fail tbh.

I think there may have been a reliability problem with early Fury Xs which would not have helped with availability. 2 of mine failed with memory problems but this is something that later Fury Xs don't seem to suffer from.

P.B · 17 Feb 2016 at 19:27

Too much spare time! How did he get all the gpus

SouthEastBlue · 18 Feb 2016 at 12:45

Surprised there's not many comments in here, looks like a very detailed comparison of cards from both sides.

layte · 18 Feb 2016 at 12:47

SouthEastBlue said:
Surprised there's not many comments in here, looks like a very detailed comparison of cards from both sides.

I'm not given the results, which if had the opposite result, would have a particular bunch of folk continuously bumping it with tedious circlejerking.

Kirby Wurm · 18 Feb 2016 at 13:16

The most surprising results are those for the last generation cards - the AMD ones have aged far better in newer titles. A 290 is competitive with the 780 Ti! Looking back to the launch of each it was a very different story. AMD's architectures have usually been more forward looking and that's very much the case here.

Competitor rules

Biggest ever 28nm gpu 70 types, 9 games, 3 resolutions

Mobster