Hi, I've been looking at this monitor (Acer Xf270HU) https://www.overclockers.co.uk/acer...descreen-led-monitor-black-red-mo-095-ac.html for an R9 390X as it's the only reasonably priced 1440p IPS screen that uses the full freesync range of 40-144Hz.
However, I've heard that it uses the same panel as the much more expensive Eizo FS2735 (£900+) which supports either 57-144Hz or 35-90Hz and the Asus MG279Q(35-90Hz). My question is, how has Acer managed to use the full range when the monitor is significantly cheaper and yet uses the same panel?
I can't find any professional reviews of this monitor from the big sites which is making me a bit wary that Acer have somehow bodged the monitor to support this range as they aren't known for quality.
Tft central have refused to review it as it uses the same panel as the Gsync version and they don't see the point. This is besides the point though as Asus and Eizo cannot get it working properly with the whole Freesync range and it would be nice to know if Acer have done something special to achieve this.
Acer insists that overdrive is functioning and it's tuned to dynamically adjust based on the refresh rate and it's simply not user adjustable. Whereas someone on overclock.net insists that this is nonsense and it is not working correctly resulting in lots of blur.
Freesync turns itself off and on repeatedly in games for some people: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4d0lld/freesync_is_broken_does_amd_even_know/
Given the above and that I have a 390x which might be under-powered, do you think it would be worth taking a chance on this monitor and a possibly broken Freesync, or should I wait for HDR? Will there be affordable options when monitors that use this technology come out?
At the moment I have a 24" Eizo 1920x1200 IPS screen that works perfectly. The only problem I have is FPS drops when Vsync is enabled in some games which means I have to disable it resulting in lots of tearing which I'm finding annoying and the 16:10 aspect ratio results in many games having a zoomed in look.
However, I've heard that it uses the same panel as the much more expensive Eizo FS2735 (£900+) which supports either 57-144Hz or 35-90Hz and the Asus MG279Q(35-90Hz). My question is, how has Acer managed to use the full range when the monitor is significantly cheaper and yet uses the same panel?
I can't find any professional reviews of this monitor from the big sites which is making me a bit wary that Acer have somehow bodged the monitor to support this range as they aren't known for quality.
Tft central have refused to review it as it uses the same panel as the Gsync version and they don't see the point. This is besides the point though as Asus and Eizo cannot get it working properly with the whole Freesync range and it would be nice to know if Acer have done something special to achieve this.
Acer insists that overdrive is functioning and it's tuned to dynamically adjust based on the refresh rate and it's simply not user adjustable. Whereas someone on overclock.net insists that this is nonsense and it is not working correctly resulting in lots of blur.
Freesync turns itself off and on repeatedly in games for some people: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4d0lld/freesync_is_broken_does_amd_even_know/
Given the above and that I have a 390x which might be under-powered, do you think it would be worth taking a chance on this monitor and a possibly broken Freesync, or should I wait for HDR? Will there be affordable options when monitors that use this technology come out?
At the moment I have a 24" Eizo 1920x1200 IPS screen that works perfectly. The only problem I have is FPS drops when Vsync is enabled in some games which means I have to disable it resulting in lots of tearing which I'm finding annoying and the 16:10 aspect ratio results in many games having a zoomed in look.
Last edited: