144hz/16:10/G-Sync/FreeSync?

Sad but true, there is nothing available that meets your criteria. Until sloping brow Neanderthals with their inability to comprehend the Y-axis are no longer form the majority, this is unlikely to change. :/
 
Why would you want a 16:10 (1920x1200 Resolution ) monitor ? :confused:
Surely a 16:9 2560x1440 Resolution monitor would much better



If it was a 30" 16:10 monitor you wanted I would understand as they have a 2560x1600 resolution
 
Last edited:
There are some business monitors in 16:10, but no gaming monitors and I doubt there will ever be one since 16:10 hardly makes any sense for gaming.

Personally I also love to have more vertical space but I've found its easier just to get a larger 16:9 monitor.
 
Yea a lot of games will give you black bars on a 16:10 screen since they don't support the resolution :/

I suspect it was dropped because it's easier to port 16:9 over from console, since that is what all TVs use.
 
Why would you want a 16:10 (1920x1200 Resolution ) monitor ? :confused:
Surely a 16:9 2560x1440 Resolution monitor would much better



If it was a 30" 16:10 monitor you wanted I would understand as they have a 2560x1600 resolution

16:10 is better than 16:9 imo, vertical space is so much harder to come by and helps with immersion more tbh.
 
16:10 rocks for general PC use. Even 15:10 is good. Surface book is 15:10.

However all gaming are 16:9. Because of console ports.
 
Nothing stopping someone buying an inch or two bigger 16:9 screen and setting Windows to a 16:10 res.

Would cost you far less than a 16:10 limited production model would cost you now if (as said above) such a thing were forced to exist.

And with bezels thinner than they were years ago the 2 inch bigger screen wouldn't take up much more space than a yesteryear equivalent old 16:10 would have done.
 
21:9 all the way for gaming.

16:10 is dead in gaming monitors has been for years.. friend of mine had a 16:10 and it looked horrible..
 
Back
Top Bottom