Not on most SSD's due to the amount of data it would end up writing to it.
Personally I have 2 Crucial M4 SSD's storing spanned readyboost, temp files, indexing & spanned page file. Prior to these I ran a 3 year old Kingston Value 64GB doing similar job. I noticed no issues other then 1 bad sector on the Kingston. I agree however that SSD's degrade, however changes are by the time an SSD fails it will be obsolete anyway.
Taken from Microsoft MSDN Windows 7 blog
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/e7/archive/2009/05/05/support-and-q-a-for-solid-state-drives-and.aspx
Should the pagefile be placed on SSDs?
Yes. Most pagefile operations are small random reads or larger sequential writes, both of which are types of operations that SSDs handle well.
In looking at telemetry data from thousands of traces and focusing on pagefile reads and writes, we find that
Pagefile.sys reads outnumber pagefile.sys writes by about 40 to 1,
Pagefile.sys read sizes are typically quite small, with 67% less than or equal to 4 KB, and 88% less than 16 KB.
Pagefile.sys writes are relatively large, with 62% greater than or equal to 128 KB and 45% being exactly 1 MB in size.
In fact, given typical pagefile reference patterns and the favorable performance characteristics SSDs have on those patterns, there are few files better than the pagefile to place on an SSD.