.

They paid back the full price that I paid for the Tuono with no questions or fighting, even though I owned it for 9 months. They also gave me 2000 chf for any damaged items of clothing without receipts needed.

So even though I lost no money from the accident I don't want to spend it all again.

I loved the aprilia but it had some electrical issues that never got resolved and the local garage stopped being an official aprilia dealer. Plus is heavier than I'd like and was hard work to throw around hair pins.

Edit: the 790 is a brand new bike so I'd take a big hit on the depreciation. It's also an unknown quality, particularly with its custom components rather than off the shelf parts like triumph uses.
 
Last edited:
I got screwed in the UK with insurance when an idiot decided that the red light wasn't for him. Insurance just seems to work better here.
 
I suppose so. All I meant was I don't want to spend the same amount on a bike as I did the last time.

It's not because I can't stretch to it, I'm just being tight.
 
You want a KTM so badly you've even listed two in your shortlist. I suspect you really want a KTM but fear suffering buyer's remorse as you'll take the biggest hit on depreciation.

Buy the 790, suck up the hit and enjoy a (fantastic) brand new bike. You owe it to yourself after your tractor incident.

What is holding me back on the KTM is the fact that they are working on an R version, and I really regretted not getting a Street Triple R.

There are also no reviews for the bike yet and I can't test ride it until it's out and by that point it will be hard to get hold of. The non-adjustable suspension may be an issue but as all the components are custom built and not off the shelf parts you can't get a feel for the bike before it's released.

I'm tempted to get a cheap bike for now and pick up a nearly new 790 or a new 790 R later on. I am very tight with my cash, I've been looking for a new TV for four years now :p
 

A very different bike to the final version. The suspension and brakes are very different for a start.

What puts me off the Street Triple RS is that it's missing a lot of the tech in the competition for a few thousand more on the price tag. No blipper, no cornering ABS, no cornering traction control, no cruise control, no LED lights etc.

I enjoyed riding the RS on both test rides though, and my current plan is to test the KTM 790 when I can. If I like it I'll buy it, if not I'll get the RS.

This thread was to hopefully discover that one perfect bike that I have been overlooking, but I'm not sure that it exists.
 
Twice i have seen the comment on here about the suspension being poor on the mt09 . On the sp it Has an ohlins rear .. im sure with a little work it could be sorted . When i had my tuono i fitted a ohlins rear and ktec front end and it fixed any issues . seems daft to dismiss a bike which could be fixed quite cheaply .

I agree with yer comment about poor range on the MT10 but i think you should revisit it . Its one of its only negatives and worth a second look .
I think for the premium the RS is lacking which is a pity . It goes well and handles well but i would want more kit for the premium .

S1000r dosent tick any of my boxes other than the tec . Really didnt enjoy the test ride .
How about the R1200R or S .. I spent a few hours on the R and was actually blown away .. The torque is addictive . Love the sound and it was the biggest surprise of all the new stuff i rode . It was in my top 3

Snaggle

They are very strict about bike modifications here, so a bike either needs to be sorted stock or with factory option parts. I imagine changing the internals of the suspension is easy to get away with, but they check that everything visible is either completely stock or it has to have authorisation papers. These papers cost a bomb to get, in the region of 600-700 GBP per item if it's even possible.

I was giggling the entire time I was out on the MT-10, it was like an excited puppy that just wanted to misbehave all the time. I'd want a 2017 model though with the improved fuelling and giving me 2 years remaining warranty which puts it out of my price range. I need to look into that some more and add it back to the list. It's heavy but it really didn't feel like it unlike my Tuono, but that's probably mostly due to the seat height/sitting "on" the bike and not "in" it with the Tuono.

I have a dealer offering me a 2017 Street Triple RS with 9000km for less than the price of a new KTM 790, with 3 years warranty or 5 years for an extra £400. This is a very nice dealer too, and they have offered to let me go on their customer track day at Anneau du Rhin for free even if I don't get a Triumph in the end. Customer service like that is extremely rare here, and saving 25% of the cost compared to a new one makes the RS seem better value for money. That also removes any concerns I would have about resale value if KTM made a 790R later on that was the bee's knees.

I agree with the S1000R. It has every piece of tech I could ever want (a TFT screen is not a plus for me, I couldn't see the RS's screen in strong winter sun) but I didn't "connect" like I did when I rode the MT-10.
 
So I thought for most Ohlins stuff there is a TUV certificate available and they list them for each bike that has it etc so it may not be so hard to get... At least in germany its fine if you have the TUV cert approval for your vehicle with the part there is no extra cost to get it on your registration. But maybe Austria is even stricter?

The German TUV certificates aren't valid here, each component has to be tested individually for Switzerland. If someone else has passed the test for your exact model and year, and your exact model for the new component, then you can buy the certificate for a few hundred quid. If not then you can pay 3000 CHF to have it tested.

( Can you remap ? )

They test noise and other emissions thoroughly at our MOT equivalent, so most bikes are unlikely to pass the tests after a remap. How Aprilia got the stock Tuono to pass is beyond me though.
 
There's a pair of brand new MT-10s (grey and black) for sale for a little under 12,000 CHF which helps to complicate things further. They would have the revised brakes, throttle, ecu and 36 months warranty.
 
Thanks for that. I think that tank range is enough to be quite annoying for me. Is that the full 17L from the fuel tank or up to reserve? I need 200km to reserve/low fuel light ideally.

I'm going to test ride the KTM 790 and read the reviews on it and then make a decision from there.
 
as close as you will get to accurate without owning one

Well that's not a problem anymore :eek:

9M33koz.jpg


CljgEYK.jpg


2016 Yamaha MT-10, 7,000KM, £7,000 (9,000 CHF).
 
@Kreeeee Good choice . Make sure it has the latest map . And get the top rad guard . Really want the akro pipe but im not paying there silly prices

It doesn't have the latest map, and it shows. I have ridden one with the smoothed throttle map and it does make a noticeable difference.

I am pickling it up after they add the rad guard and an SW Motech top ring to it for free. Do you recommend getting the oil guard too? It has a few bent fins already as you can see in the photos.

I have ridden one with and one without the akra slip on now and they sound identical. Maybe the stock is a little more metallic on idle but once rolling there is no difference. My akra money will be going on a blipper next year if I don't crash this one.

This is so much more fun than the Tuono!

Edit: I will be getting the comfort seat too I think. We'll see how it goes in Spring.
 
Looks real nice, I love the wheels - how would you compare it to the S1000R?

Also when are you even picking it up? Surely it's pretty snowy at the moment to ride it home?

I'll post a comparison when I'm not on my phone. I'll pick it up late March or early April when the weather starts to warm up.

Edit: The S1000R is an absolute weapon, and I really can't deny that it is marginally better in every way compared to the MT-10. It weighs less, makes more power, has a blipper, has better fuel range, better suspension (once you disable the Adaptive Suspension), less depreciation etc.

The main problem I had with the S1000R is you didn't feel alive on it until you were nipping at triple digits. It does a lot of the work for you to make you go fast, so to feel closer to the edge you had to be doing silly speeds. The buzzy bars also made my hands go numb.

The MT-10 just makes you feel alive at any speed. Going from 30MPH to 60MPH lofting the front wheel in the process just makes you giggle, and it also handled and stopped superbly too. The depreciation also worked in my favour as I got a great deal while a BMW of a similar age and mileage (which would lack the blipper) would at least 25% more.

For a bike to ride to a track and do a track day the S1000R is pretty much impossible to fault, but the MT-10 is a bike you buy because you just enjoy riding. Plus BMW charge an arm and a leg for parts and labour here.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't sound very optimistic... lol

How do you find it more fun? Power delivery, handling or just better all round?

It's a far better street bike, and all the fun is in the acceleration instead of in the outright speed and maximum lean. The tuono is very fun ridden fast on perfect surfaces, the mt 10 is fun most of the time.

The mt 10 is an excited puppy that is just happy you threw a ball at it while the tuono is a very serious tool with the world's best sound track, looking for a race circuit to play on.
 
@Kreeeee Good choice . Make sure it has the latest map . And get the top rad guard . Really want the akro pipe but im not paying there silly prices

Do you have any info on this map that I can send to the dealer, I'll really struggle to explain this in French. I know it hasn't been done because it's only had the first service done on it at 1000 km before the map was released.

Is this something they'll pickup at the next service or could they miss it?
 
Back
Top Bottom