Conditional on the same response time (2ms) and most other stats, which of the two sizes is best for gaming? 20" or 22"?
One factor is that both 20" and 22" seem to have the same native resolutions, 1680x1050, meaning on the smaller screen size you get smaller pixels per square inch, giving a better image in fast moving games.
Naturally a larger 22" viewing screen is nice, but my concern is would this compromise fast fps gaming too much relative to a smaller 20" screen. (I'm into the Unreal Tournament games, but also play World of Warcraft, so want an all rounder which can perform at both levels)
I'm thinking of the Samsung SyncMaster 226BW (22") and also the Iiyama ProLite 2201W-B (22") versus the Samsung SM-206BW 20".
What you think? What are your experiences of both? Thanks.
One factor is that both 20" and 22" seem to have the same native resolutions, 1680x1050, meaning on the smaller screen size you get smaller pixels per square inch, giving a better image in fast moving games.
Naturally a larger 22" viewing screen is nice, but my concern is would this compromise fast fps gaming too much relative to a smaller 20" screen. (I'm into the Unreal Tournament games, but also play World of Warcraft, so want an all rounder which can perform at both levels)
I'm thinking of the Samsung SyncMaster 226BW (22") and also the Iiyama ProLite 2201W-B (22") versus the Samsung SM-206BW 20".
What you think? What are your experiences of both? Thanks.
Last edited: