£230 camera for young person new to photography?

Soldato
Joined
31 May 2005
Posts
15,640
Location
Nottingham
My base pick is this:

https://www.canon.co.uk/for_home/product_finder/cameras/digital_camera/powershot/powershot_sx540_hs/

No idea if good or not but seems to tick all the boxes?

Something which will grow with them so a little more advanced than a point and shoot.

Main use will be outdoors, nature/wildlife photography. Ability to record good 1080p video would be welcome.

A strong optical zoom would also be appreciated.

£230 excludes memory card and other accessories.

Many thanks for any pointers.
 
How young are they?

They will soon outgrow a rubbish bridge camera like that. For £100 I'd get them something used like a 30D/450D, D80, D40x, and a kit lens and and a fast prime.

They'll learn much more with those than with a tiny sensor-ed bridge camera.
 
They'll learn much more with those than with a tiny sensor-ed bridge camera.
That Canon is no "bridge" camera.
That's Ixus Point&Shoot with pretty unpocketable zoom lens.

Bridge camera would have for start:
1. EVF for lot more stable shooting stance. (so that IS isn't wasted)
2. proper zoom control instead of clumsy button pushing zoom.
3. Front and rear dials/wheels for direct control of two variables.
(aperture/shutter speed and exposure compensation or in manual mode both aperture and shutter)
4. Raw support
 
I got the SX540 for £197.

More than happy with the quality and feature set for the price.

The RX100 is nowhere near the same price point.

I have to say, the zoom on the SX540 gets the job done nicely and overall is a good camera relative to expenditure when taking into account its intended use.

Sometimes, the intended user does not need RAW or other featrures
 
I got the SX540 for £197.

More than happy with the quality and feature set for the price.

The RX100 is nowhere near the same price point.

I have to say, the zoom on the SX540 gets the job done nicely and overall is a good camera relative to expenditure when taking into account its intended use.

Sometimes, the intended user does not need RAW or other featrures


Wow. I paid £260 3 years ago. Though you can find them for £270 on ebay.
 
Something which will grow with them so a little more advanced than a point and shoot.

Main use will be outdoors, nature/wildlife photography. Ability to record good 1080p video would be welcome.
That's tough requirement, even without longer zoom for that price.
Or really even for higher price with basically extinction of fixed lens camera diversity.

And even in "no limits" budget level there's always some compromising.
Weaknesses just move to different areas like portability and convenience...
With system cameras needing to carry multiple lenses and need to change those.

Especially outdoor/nature photography covers huge amount of various areas with vastly different requirements for shooting style and optics.
Even leaving out optics requirements those have lots of requirements.
Like wide landscapes, forests and especially sunsets usually demanding good dynamic range from sensors.
Something not exactly well available from camera with big marketing pee number in smallest commonly used sensor.

Well, at least 1080p video recording is easy to find.
Would have to be very outdated camera to lack it.

But that allows freedom to look for used cameras.
With focus in phone cameras development of fixed lens digicams has really mostly stalled and three to four years old models are perfectly good for getting familiar with taking photos.
Besides giving change to get camera with more direct external controls.

That Canon exactly won't help user to want to learn more about photography and controlling camera.
With pretty much any setting change needing to going to button tap dance menu doesn't make user to want to try them.
While lack of viewfinder teaches bad unstable shooting stance.
And old style fixed LCD is bad in teaching to look for different perspective like near ground level perspective.
In some macro/close up photography getting that camera to right place if extremely important and articulating LCD helps lot in that.

Myself originally though about Powershot G3 (lot higher class than SX540) as first camera.
Fortunately ended to Minolta Dimage 7i.
With little practising it was possible to use important settings without taking camera from eye...
Powershot G3 certainly wouldn't have inspired me to try different settings as much.
 
Within your price range if you are looking for a camera with the PASM modes as found on DSLRs then I would suggest looking at the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70 or look at the Nikon COOLPIX B500 which does not have the PASM dial on it but looks and feels like a DLSR.

Each camera then has other pros and cons, I'd look at them in detail. The Panasonic is able to shoot in RAW where as the Nikon has a larger zoom and images are 16MP. Either one will be a great entry into Photography if the user delves into the theory behind why and how the camera does what it does.

Ask questions here if you are not sure about something.
 
Thanks @EGuitarStar.

I went with the SX540 in the end, simply because it had a higher resolution and higher optical zoom.

What are the differences between that and the B500? I am still within returns period.

I did get the Canon for £197 though.
 
So taking all that into account @EsaT What would you suggest for £230?

Are we saying there is no camera meeting the original spec I posted?

Rather sad.

Just buy a phone then?

Nikon D7000 is an obvious choice at that price.

The thing is no one who shoots wildlife uses a big optical zoom, no one who is into photography uses a camera with a fixed lens or a tiny sensor, period. They are completely impractical and give crap image quality.
 
Back
Top Bottom