• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

2600k or Sandybridge E?

Soldato
Joined
16 Sep 2005
Posts
7,912
Location
What used to be a UK
Some slight gaming but main use would be video encoding and rendering. Will there be any real tangible benefits in buying the SE as opposed to the (overclocked) 2600k bundle? Currently using a 6600. Thank you.
 
I would think SE would benefit you, but you would have to way up the extra speed against the greater overal cost that SE will be. Haven't seen any reviews for SE yet. Did read that intel had a small chipset problem with that platform though. I'd wait for reviews then wayup the costs, also how long the platforms are going to last aswell. 1366 didn't last long.
 
Its pretty simple, a hex core for £500+ WILL be faster than a quad core with dual channel memory, really isn't that hard to work it out.

Its also fairly easy to work out that if you have a 6600..... not hugely useful as theres both E6600's and Q6600's, but either way, if you're "living" with that and haven't upgraded to anything between then and up to now, then the "encoding and rendering" you do isn't time critical, or you'd already have upgraded.

A 2600k will be a pretty huge performance jump from a Q6600, a truly massive jump from a E6600, and seeing as its clearly not critical, I can't see where spending the extra £500 on a hexcore SB-E would be worthwhile.
 
Good advice everybody. Thank you drunkenmaster. True it's not time critical (more of a hobby) so maybe the 2600k is good enough for a couple of years.
 
Back
Top Bottom