-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
2700X... this can't be right?
- Thread starter Legend
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 3,289
- Location
- deep space nine
Think there is some chatter on the main ryzen 2 thread about HW monitor / info ? Misreporting speeds
When I compare with Ryzen Master there's definitely some correlation with the live values... but that max value in HW Monitor can't be correct. Can't see if there's any logging option in Ryzen Master though... doesn't appear to be unless I'm just not seeing it.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 3,212
- Location
- Solihull
No, it isn't accurate for ryzen clockspeeds. For me, it reports a max of 6ghz for the 2700X.
Ryzen master or HWInfo do the job.
Ryzen master or HWInfo do the job.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2007
- Posts
- 16,128
- Location
- Outer Space
If I'd known that chip would do 4.8GHz then I wouldn't have sold it lolI'm seeing this in Hardware Monitor... can't be right can it? 2700X can't go that high?
Whoever makes coretemp needs to get the finger out and make it properly ryzen compatible. It always reports some insane max temp for some reason and has done for over a year now. You'd think by now they would have fixed whatever bug is responsible for this.
Coretemp was never written for AMD cpu's in the first place, it was always intended to work with Intel. In fact it works that well with Intel that when i had X58 975's and 990's under phase it would read the negative temps fairly accurately.
No harm in them getting it to work properly with it. They still update the program so i don't see why its still bugged.
Oh, i fully agree with you there Gerard. It's no excuse for it not to work properly nowdays. As it happens i just use Hwinfo64, a much better app anyway with loads more info than coretemp ever did have in the first place.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,312
- Location
- Dormanstown.
Core temp has always been terrible for AMD.
Have you tried an updated version of Core Temp?, current version is 1.12.1.
Quite a few changes for AMD CPU's in the last two versions.
https://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/history.html
Quite a few changes for AMD CPU's in the last two versions.
https://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/history.html