This is the case,
I got one Asus 4850 and a full HD monitor. I don't game a lot (thus not really happy to spend a lot of money on a 5850) but when I do I like to have all the goodies as high as I can.
I have noticed that in synthetic benchmarks 2x4850 are a good match to a 5850. However the low ram of the cards has been singled out as a consideration against the 1gb of the 5850 - which some posters say makes a different when gaming at full HD.
What is your take on this?
Is it worth getting an extra 4850 for around £50? Is it going to make a considerable difference when gaming at 1920x1280 or not?
I am not that interested on lower resolutions.
Thank you in advance for any reply.
I got one Asus 4850 and a full HD monitor. I don't game a lot (thus not really happy to spend a lot of money on a 5850) but when I do I like to have all the goodies as high as I can.
I have noticed that in synthetic benchmarks 2x4850 are a good match to a 5850. However the low ram of the cards has been singled out as a consideration against the 1gb of the 5850 - which some posters say makes a different when gaming at full HD.
What is your take on this?
Is it worth getting an extra 4850 for around £50? Is it going to make a considerable difference when gaming at 1920x1280 or not?
I am not that interested on lower resolutions.
Thank you in advance for any reply.