Erm, what?
By using a % income based approach, you ensure that everyone pays the same proportion of income for the same services, and the rich subsidise the poor...
"for the same services"?
This isn't what your posts suggest.
Erm, what?
By using a % income based approach, you ensure that everyone pays the same proportion of income for the same services, and the rich subsidise the poor...
Erm, what?
By using a % income based approach, you ensure that everyone pays the same proportion of income for the same services, and the rich subsidise the poor...
What's the defiling about some prisons being ran by private companies MrMoon ?
"for the same services"?
This isn't what your posts suggest.
[TW]Fox;20683164 said:No, he's pointing out that it would end up as a two tier system because the savvy and intelligent - who will generally be richer anyway - will sit down and ensure they get the best value bin man, whilst the majority, who can probably ill afford to, will not bother and end up with default provision.
If the default provision is poor, why lumber everyone with it without any choice?
[TW]Fox;20683199 said:Why not lumber everyone with a default provision thats excellent?
Do you have specific criticisms of your current council refuse collection?
I wouldn't say it is excellent, adequate at best, and could probably be provided better. It is hard to tell when no alternative is permitted.
Specific criticisms would be around sporadic collection and inconsistent timings...
I wouldn't say it is excellent, adequate at best, and could probably be provided better.
Specific criticisms would be around sporadic collection and inconsistent timings...
[TW]Fox;20682967 said:Yes, because like it or not in this country of almost 70 million people, quite a large proportion of them are the average person and a scary proportion are the below average. They would be quite capable of ending up with a pile of stinking rubbish in the garden because they simply couldn't be arsed to tear themselves away from I'm a Celeb long enough to allocate some of the personal budget towards waste collection.
I wouldn't say it is excellent, adequate at best, and could probably be provided better. It is hard to tell when no alternative is permitted.
Specific criticisms would be around sporadic collection and inconsistent timings...
In which case complain to your elected representative. It's what they are there for.
Blurgh its official my uni is shut tomorrow. Not impressed at all as my lecturers who are part of the union do a terrible job and are not even qualified to get a teachers pension @_@
Worse still my idiot students union is supporting the strike action directly by picketing with the staff. Not impressed as this is just protectionism of the few with decent pensions and not a fight to make the state pension any better for everyone.
The unions striking are just as greedy as the idiot bankers and I'm suffering by having more forced days closure of university time that I have already payed for.
Not impressed
Word has it that as many as 50% of people are below average.
You assume that my elected representative is in some way useful. I do contact her with concerns, but she is hopeless. Classics have included 'the opinion of ministers is more important than scientific evidence' and 'You can't criticise services when they don't do what they promise because the staff will be upset'...
You assume that my elected representative is in some way useful. I do contact her with concerns, but she is hopeless. Classics have included 'the opinion of ministers is more important than scientific evidence' and 'You can't criticise services when they don't do what they promise because the staff will be upset'...
Auto spell on iPad is a pain sometimes.