32''@4k vs 34'' UW@1440p for wfh

lm365

lm365

lm365

Associate
Joined
9 Nov 2020
Posts
1
I'm trying to get a monitor. The primary use will be working (programming). I don't game at all, and I'll sometimes watch videos but I do have a tv, so it isn't the biggest concern.

Which one of those would be better?
The models I'm looking at right now are LG 32un650-w adn LG 34WN750-b which are both $500.
There's also a 32''@1440p option which is around half the price.
I know I don't have too much options especially since my budget isn't high.
Thoughts?
 
Programming you tend to cover your workspace in open windows so the more workspace you have the better. Hoenstly I wouldn't spend your money on 4K. Although they have a huge area the text is so small you can't really take advantage of that area. I wouldn't go about the pixel density of a 34" 3440x1440 so that would be the size I would suggest.
 
pp111 said:
Although they have a huge area the text is so small you can't really take advantage of that area.
Click to expand...

Twaddle. Windows has text scaling.

lm365 said:
I know I don't have too much options especially since my budget isn't high.
Click to expand...

If you had the budget I would recommend multiple 4k monitors with scaling turned on. The higher PPI really does make a difference to the look of the text, making it easier on the eye. I have a 24" 4K Dell Ultrasharp set with 175% scaling and it's lovely.
 
Personally i would go for multiple 1440p monitors. I WFH on laptop and 4k monitor (not a programmer, just 3rd Line server support) and at work I have two 1440p (plus laptop's HD screen) - some GUI's don't scale that well on 4k monitor and I miss them when at home.
 
I'm a web developer and have a 28" 4k Samsung and a 24" 1080p. Multiple monitors is fantastic but the desk space required is quite a lot. I sit directly in front of the 28" with windows scaling set at 150% and the pixel density is awesome, everything is super smooth.

The 24" is secondary and used for Teams and file browsing etc. It's overkill really and hangs slightly off the edge of the desk.

I'm looking to swap for a single 34" ultrawide as I do a bit of gaming on the side too. I've no intention of selling the other monitors unless I'm certain I like the ultrawide feel, especially for dev work. I've never used one before. I'd really like a 38" but I don't see how 4" bigger justifies 100% cost increase?
 
And for multiple monitors I ditched their bases for a single dual monitor stand as my desk is also quite narrow - two stands were not quite fitting - and monitors do overhang on both sides of desk. I have seen modular stands where you can get more than one layer of monitors that are going through a hole in a desk. I also actually have still working but badly burned out 24'' that is on the floor waiting for emergencies and not used anymore as my stand is only 2 monitor capable - otherwise I would use it as well - never enough desktop estate :) :)

As for ultrawide - no experience :( seen one IRL on my Director's desk, and have mixed feelings. Can see benefits of it for sure if you're in market for new monitor or previous don't have options you want, on other side i have several input devices to my monitors and very often watch TV on second monitor while doing stuff in single monitor configuration on other monitor..

Window scalling - whatever float your boat here, if your software does good job on this front then go for it - 1 cable set instead of 2 or more at back of desk is also not something to forget..

For the OP:
I have best of both worlds personally - two 27'' monitors, one is 4k@60Hz for graphical fidelity oriented tasks and for games like Cities Skyline and Anno 1800, second is 1440p 240Hz refresh for good GUI experience without window scaling things, and for FPS gaming.

There's also one factor in play - your health. Older monitor technologis are - well - old, and new monitor have impact on your eyes. You plan to WFH - that's a big thing to consider as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom