35mm1.8G or 55mm1.8G?

Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2012
Posts
4,409
as above really

it is to go on a d3200 which is a DX format camera. and ive learned that 50mm are great prime lenses to learn with and produce great shots and the same for the 35mm

which would be the better lens to buy

iam a amateur btw
 
35 first. 50 if you want a portraiture lens but I'd consider saving for the Sigma 50 1.4 instead of the 50 1.8 at that point; just see where your shooting goes after shooting with the 35 for a while
 
By the 55mm1.8G I assume you mean the 50mm f/1.8 G (AF-S)


They are both great lenses and work really well for portrait lenses. A lot depends on your style, 35mm is a little wider and gives head and shoulders only when close,good upper body kinds of shot, and allows full body portraits if you have space.
The 50mm gives head only, head and shoulder but you struggle to get more of the body unless you can back off enough, which is not always possible indoors.

Saying that, for general photography you might find the 35mm length a little boring on a crop camera, but the 50mm is still not quite enough telephoto for my likes either, ehne why although I own both lenses I don't use them that much, i prefer to use my 24-70 as a 2 prime outfit using either the 24mm end or the 70mm end and swapping easily between the 2. A 24-70mm on a crop ends up like having a 35mm + 105MM double prime in one lens, which is useful for certain events but no where near wide enough in general, and is far more expensive than the 2 primes you list.



I'm babbling away here. I would test the 2 focal length with whatever zoom lens you have on you and see what you think is better. Overall the 35mm is a little more versatile but slightly more boring, the 50mm is a little telephoto on a crop camera so is not as useful but can make for a nicer perspective for portraits , especially close ups.

You cannot go wrong with either.
 
i use my camera for a hobby and most of the time im at car events, F1 is coming up but i wont be purchasing a lens till after.

im using the 18-55 kit lens atm and i think its fine but ive heard from lots of sources that either of these lenses are great to have in your kit.
 
On a DX body you're better going for the 35mm, as it is the equivalent to ~52mm on FX.

That's what I did anyway.

Both great lenses at a good price.
 
On a DX body you're better going for the 35mm, as it is the equivalent to ~52mm on FX.

That's what I did anyway.

Both great lenses at a good price.

I don't get that logic, the 50mm on DX is similar to a 75-80mm full frame which is close to the classic 85mm portrait lens. Whats your point?

Both lenses have their uses.
 
I don't get that logic, the 50mm on DX is similar to a 75-80mm full frame which is close to the classic 85mm portrait lens. Whats your point?

Both lenses have their uses.

The point is 50mm is the classic normal lens on a 35mm film camera really it should be 43mm (ish) as thats the diagonal on a 35mm piece of film but thats taking the debate too far.

I think the point people are making is that if you want a more general purpose prime then the 35mm will give you loads more shooting oppertunities on a crop body. You are of course right that the 50mm makes an excellent portrait lens on a crop but in gerneral shooting it's not as useful so given that the op didn't specify a use the general purpose recomendation is probably better.
 
Why not have a look through the exif info on your pictures and see what focal length you've been mostly using.


If you use the trial of lightroom is very easy to search your images according to focal length
 
i have had the camera for a couple of days now so i cant really say what focal length ive used most, this is why i wanted some opinions on both lenses just so that when i do buy one of them id be happy with it

by the sounds of it though i will be happy with either so im not worried
 
i have had the camera for a couple of days now so i cant really say what focal length ive used most, this is why i wanted some opinions on both lenses just so that when i do buy one of them id be happy with it

by the sounds of it though i will be happy with either so im not worried

If you've only had it for a few days I would stick with the 18-55 for a bit longer and see how things develop.

As it happens I went from a 18-55 to the 35 f1.8 because I wanted something that performed better in low light. It might not however be the way your photography develops.
 
Last edited:
the purchase of this lense wont be till mid july or even august so i have plenty of time to develope myself, i have done about 500 shots in 2 days haha, been fiddling with so much stuff i have had to reset the camera to default, ive been writing down a few settings that i liked for various siuations, such as earlier when i was in the garden and it was bright but i was shooting in some dark areas. unfortunatly i have currently lost my note book

295447_10151090098035864_131934860_n.jpg


this has had no pp, my steadiness is getting better, the VR definitely helps though

also facebook really ruins the sharpness of pics, it is so much better from my hdd
 
Why not have a look through the exif info on your pictures and see what focal length you've been mostly using.


If you use the trial of lightroom is very easy to search your images according to focal length

That way doesn't necessarily work too well particularly when there's a focal length you're considering at the end of one of the ranges - zooms aren't just used for their perspective changes, particularly lower end zooms get a lot of sheer convenience use - that is, the 50mm end of an 18-55 is often used simply because it's what the person has on, and it takes less effort to turn to 55 to zoom rather than to walk up and shoot at 30. Likewise for 18mm, I doubt many people actually have too much use for an 18mm prime on a crop but if you apply the logic of looking at focal length history, a lot of the time 18 will get used simply because it's the easiest way on the 18-55 to get everything in without having to walk back a couple of steps
 
I'd personally go for the 50mm as it offers more to the DX user by way of background separation. I'd rather something completely different than just another general purpose lens at that stage.

The 35mm is a great lens however, personally, I find the distortion very bad to the point that it's quite off-putting for something that is billed as "general purpose". The bokeh is also none too pleasing. The 50 isn't amazing either but I'd take it over the 35mm...assuming we're talking about the new 50mm.
 
That way doesn't necessarily work too well particularly when there's a focal length you're considering at the end of one of the ranges - zooms aren't just used for their perspective changes, particularly lower end zooms get a lot of sheer convenience use - that is, the 50mm end of an 18-55 is often used simply because it's what the person has on, and it takes less effort to turn to 55 to zoom rather than to walk up and shoot at 30. Likewise for 18mm, I doubt many people actually have too much use for an 18mm prime on a crop but if you apply the logic of looking at focal length history, a lot of the time 18 will get used simply because it's the easiest way on the 18-55 to get everything in without having to walk back a couple of steps

Except if you would have to go back a couple of miles to get everything to fit in, or if you were to step back other obstructions would enter the view, or if you were to step back you would have to knock down a wall. There are plenty of reasons why someone would want an 18mm or wider lens, 18mm is only 27/29mm on a crop, not even close to a stand 24mm prime on FF.

i agree that people might not always use a zoom lens appropriately but many people will find the extreme ends of a zoom lens to be the most interesting places to be, the middle ground tends to produce fairly boring photos in many situations. The fallacy of looking at focal length usage with zoom lenses is you might think you want an 18mm prime and a 50mm prime, but really you want a 10-24mm lens and a 105mm or 70-200mm lens.

You will also find the same sampling issue when people only use prime lenses, since it takes more time and energy to swap lenses people will tend to stick with 1 prime lens on their camera rather than continuously swapping lenses at every photographic opportunity. Furthermore, people would be more likely to use certain prime lenses for alternative reasons than pure focal length, e.g. after paying a load of money for a 35mm f/1.4 L they might use that far more often than a 50mm lens, except from their photography a 50mm lens may make far more sense (I often see people cropping photos from a 35mm lens to have the same FoV as a 50mm lens, their only reason for using the 35mm lens was because it was so expensive relative to their nifty-fifty, still the wrong lens to use). You wont get this bias using a suitable zoom lens


To really decide what focal length you want you should set the zoom to a certain prime length and do a whole days shooting to see if you like it, compare that with other focal lengths.




Contrasty to popular eleif, it is perfectly possible to use a zoom lens like a prime, simply tape down the zoom ring and go have fun.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom