• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3770k for 780 sli?

Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2003
Posts
3,749
Location
Motherwell, Scotland
Hey all,

Going to be upgrading from an i5 760 / skt1156 setup shortly, and I was wondering if the 3770k is the minimum I should be looking at to run 780 sli comfortably?

Or is there a better option out there?
 
a 2600k/2700k sb,3770k ib or 4770k haswell would be ideal,whatever fits your needs/budget best

its a toss up between ib or haswell tbh,haswell will be the fastest clock for clock but ib doesn't run as hot, swings and roundabouts really
 
Just to add to wazza's comment, a 3820 or 4820k would also suffice though the initial outlay of x79 can cost a bit more :)
 
Cheers guys.

I'll probably go with the 3770k as the few £££'s saved over x79 will go towards a psu upgrade.
 
Tbh if buying brand new id just go for the 4770k, there isnt an awful lot of difference in price between it and the 3770k. Newer architecture and slightly faster than ib. As wazza says though, the 3770k will run a bit cooler, (ive owned both cpu's myself). Both chips are great with sli'd gpu's.
 
If I didn't need a new psu then I could justify x79, but my budget won't stretch that far.
 
A 3 year old 700w OCZ ModXstream.

Fine for a single 780, but I wouldn't be happy running 2 on it with only 46A on the v12 rail.
 
A 3 year old 700w OCZ ModXstream.

Fine for a single 780, but I wouldn't be happy running 2 on it with only 46A on the v12 rail.

No, not with 80 Plus old OCZ. 4770K will be fine (X79 only few % difference), remember about OC and good cooler as it can get hot. But again "is all about Benjamin"
 
Hi,

Sorry for injection ;-) but have you seen any benchmarks/tests regarding to i5/i7 comparison paired with the strongest cards (GTX 780Ti for example) in SLI ? What's the i5 impact result of lacking the HT capabilities in the accordance to the drivers overhead (especially in games that use CPU power so much, like BF4) ?
 
bf3.gif


And

10861437936_282fd979d9.jpg



plus

10861540934_9d2f97340d.jpg



http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/


10861514525_a2d74d4bf7_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
i5's simply run out of threads with dual cards on multi threaded engines such as frostbite and can in some cases create a bottleneck. I would always recommend an 8 thread i7 for multi cards these days :)

As for x79 x16/x16, the perf gap between it and x8/x8 over pci 3.0 has minimal impact, iirc in most cases its less then 1%. Going for a 3rd or 4th card then x79 all the way as most will do 16/8/8 minimum :D
 
i5's simply run out of threads with dual cards on multi threaded engines such as frostbite and can in some cases create a bottleneck. I would always recommend an 8 thread i7 for multi cards these days :)

As for x79 x16/x16, the perf gap between it and x8/x8 over pci 3.0 has minimal impact, iirc in most cases its less then 1%. Going for a 3rd or 4th card then x79 all the way as most will do 16/8/8 minimum :D

Pretty much +1.
 
IMO More than 2 cards for GAMING is overkill, you will not get what you paid for

http://us.hardware.info/reviews/463...ay-sli-battlefield-3---1920x1080-+-frametimes

Benchmarks (3dmark) is another story..

Whislt I agree scaling above 2 cards isn't always great, I'd bet those extra frames at high res are most welcome.

Bit of an odd one that graph, why on earth would someone want to run 3 way sli 780's at 1920x1080?? On top of that their 2 way 780 figures look miles out from my own testing, by contrast their 3 way figures are likely out. I use the same settings at the same res on bf4 and avg in the 140-160 region, map dependant. My guess is they're heavily cpu bottlenecked as by the sound of it that 3960x is running stock speed (they don't state otherwise). Scaling will gradually get worse on a lower clock speed which is evident here, iirc a 3960x would need to be in the 4.6ghz+ region to allow three cards to stretch their legs.
 
Yep that links much better as it shows the benefit of a 3rd card when the resolution is increased to 2560x1600, that gap will likely get bigger as resolution increases further (5760x1080, 4k etc...) :)
 
Back
Top Bottom