3770K O/C not stable anymore

Soldato
Joined
10 Nov 2006
Posts
8,578
Location
Lincolnshire
Ive had my 3770K running @4.8 with 1.350V for the last year or so, nice and prime95 stable using a Noctua cooler maxing 90c in the hottest parts of prime.

While burning a DVD and running some virus checking software I got BSOD today. Ran prime95 to check things, noticed my temps are higher than before and I crashed after 20 mins.

What could cause this all of a sudden, has the chip worn and I need to lower the clocks? I was at the limit of volts and temp previously so cannot increase either of these to stabilize again.

Strange any ideas?
 
do yourself a favour and don't run prime because it gives you unrealistic temps and does not prove anything.

All you need to see if your pc is stable is to use it normally and that is it no need for prime at all.
 
look in event viewer/custom view it will list what it crashed on

might need more cpu voltage

different bios versions also affect how much voltage is needed to be stable sometimes (just incase you updated the bios recently)
 
Will resit tonight, Ive also noticed 1 or 2 workers in prime95 are lagging behind quite bad.

completely normal, I was worried about this recently but it turns out that your PC's OS needs to do things in the back ground, thus some cores will lag behind as they have to maintain your GUI etc
 
do yourself a favour and don't run prime because it gives you unrealistic temps and does not prove anything.

All you need to see if your pc is stable is to use it normally and that is it no need for prime at all.

This goes against every sensible bit of information I know of PC's. Prime95 Will stress your PC more than gaming or just using the PC normally in a day to day basis,Putting it under much higher loads than gaming/video encoding. Thus logically if you pass prime your stable for every day use.

You Want to get unrealistic temps as well! I know from experience that if my prime is at 75c then there is no way I will hit that while gaming etc so its a great indicator.

Honestly though the prime95 method has been used for years, With good reason. If you pass an hour of prime with 0 errors/bsod then (Unless you are folding@home) you are good to go from my experience ;)
 
This goes against every sensible bit of information I know of PC's. Prime95 Will stress your PC more than gaming or just using the PC normally in a day to day basis,Putting it under much higher loads than gaming/video encoding. Thus logically if you pass prime your stable for every day use.

You Want to get unrealistic temps as well! I know from experience that if my prime is at 75c then there is no way I will hit that while gaming etc so its a great indicator.

Honestly though the prime95 method has been used for years, With good reason. If you pass an hour of prime with 0 errors/bsod then (Unless you are folding@home) you are good to go from my experience ;)

It is a bad way to stress your pc as you limit your over clock because of unrealistic temps.

Don't belive me that is fine but even ocuk's resident oc guru 8 pack he says it is and I quote junk but hey what does he know right.
 
It is a bad way to stress your pc as you limit your over clock because of unrealistic temps.

Don't belive me that is fine but even ocuk's resident oc guru 8 pack he says it is and I quote junk but hey what does he know right.

Dont quote something you cant adequately explain yourself ;)

Or at least back up with a quote from 8 pack, As i know he is an Extreme overclocker his methods could be more tuned towards the extreme rather than the average user
 
Re-seated CPU cooler, hasn't made any difference to temps.
Ive played around in the bios and things seem to be more stable even with the high temps, Prime95 ran for 20mins then Prime95 stopped responding, I take it this mean it isn't stable. However no crashes in games or benchmarking.
 
OK done that multiplier now at 47, temps near enough the same maybe 2c lower, prime95 passed 20 minutes without a problem and workers are near perfect sync. However the second set of tests in prime (blend) took my CPU temps over 100 and I stopped the test.
 
It doesn't run at 90 constantly, idle is low 30's, on the desktop and loading programs/app's I see low 40's, gaming I see 60/70's depending on the game. 90% of prime95 is in the mid 80's, it just peeks around 90c a couple of times during a test.
 
Last edited:
I really don't think 90c max in prime95 for 30 mins is that high for a hot chip like a 3770k, but correct me if I'm wrong.

Currently running 4.6 with 1.285V nice a stable so far with max temp hitting 85c..question is how much decrease in performance can I expect in gaming between 4.8 and 4.6?
 
It's possible for a machine to be able to complete Prime but still crash or have problems when gaming. Prime hammers your CPU with very specific patterns of usage; it's nothing like using the machine for actual gaming.

Sure it might give you a general idea of whether the system is stable or not, but you'll never know if it's completely stable without using it normally for a while.
 
prime95 is gentle compared to linx and intel burn test

you won't notice much if any loss @ 4.6ghz

idk if your delidded op?
 
Back
Top Bottom