• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3950X slightly faster than 10900K at 4K with 5700X: PCIe4?

Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
50,065
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Hardware Unboxed are thinking about using the 3950X instead of the 10900K for RTX 3000 series testing, because the Ryzen CPU's have PCIe4, and in a poll 83% voted to use the 3950X.
He also acknowledged there was little interest in their Z490 and Intel 10K series reviews, he's of the view most people now run Ryzen and wants to better represent users.

So he did some testing, there was not a huge difference between the 10900K and 3950X at 1080P with a 2080TI, mostly under 10% while at 1440P there was nothing between them.

What is interesting the higher the resolution on the 5700XT the better the 3950X did, at 4K the 3950X was never slower but in most instances slightly faster than the 10900K, small margins but Steve said these differences are consistently repeatable in every run.

KAOt2PZ.png



 
From what I recall, only the 5500 XT (and only the 4GB ones) had shown substantial differences with PCI-E 4 versus 3, but unlike the 5700 it's limited to 8 lanes on the card. Would be interesting if this applies to the 5700 XT too, though going forwards, for how long can it push the pixels fast enough to be playable at 4K?
 
Now that is how I want to see a CPU tested, none of this useless 720/1080P medium setting crap. Good work Hardware Unboxed.
 
Thing is there decision to use an intel or amd cpu will answer itself in a few months anyway, i dont think intel will hold the gaming (or 1080p gaming) crown when Zen3 appears.
 
From what I recall, only the 5500 XT (and only the 4GB ones) had shown substantial differences with PCI-E 4 versus 3, but unlike the 5700 it's limited to 8 lanes on the card. Would be interesting if this applies to the 5700 XT too, though going forwards, for how long can it push the pixels fast enough to be playable at 4K?

The 5700XT is a pretty good pixel pusher, i play Star Citizen at 3200x1800P Very High, it can't quite manage 3840X2160P, its 8GB choke.
 
The problem for PC's is PCI-E 4.0 is still tragically slow compared to what consoles have in terms of interconnects, so next gen ports could be crippled even by PCI-E 4.0. PCI-E 6.0 looks a lot more respectable compared to what modern consoles have.
 
The problem for PC's is PCI-E 4.0 is still tragically slow compared to what consoles have in terms of interconnects, so next gen ports could be crippled even by PCI-E 4.0. PCI-E 6.0 looks a lot more respectable compared to what modern consoles have.
Isn't pcie4 5gbps and ps5 5.5?
 
Horizon zero dawn is an anomaly as it seems to really hammer the PCI-E bus when it shouldn't need to, that game seems to be treating the PC like the console unified memory architecture where all RAM/VRAM is GDDR5. So I would expect PCI-E 4.0 to gain a slight advantage here where it's thrashing the PCI-E bus.
 
Back
Top Bottom