3d Mark 06 scores thread

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 15:09

Well guys, lets have the scores you get!!!

I'll make a table if this thread gets going

.

Make it easier by providing this information, i will use AndyDewar as an example

Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2.3 Ghz
1 Gb Twinmos PC3200 ram (crappy timings)
Geforce 6800 GT @ 405/1050

2547 3dmarks
SM2 1124
SM3 1012
CPU 807

laid out like that is nice

Tom

Tables updated 19/2/06 11:00am

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 15:39

I didnt see the lovely village in the teaser trailer? With all the sunlight and stuff

Tom

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 15:52

what drivers are they lordedmond?

Tom

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 15:59

why are they non-fm approved? and contain a different number to my ones.

Tom

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 19:13

two tables one for single core and the other for dual core?

What you think

Tom

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 19:27

Lt_Col_Jack_ONe said:
Great idea but also do one with dual and single combined would nice to see for once that dual cores are really the best.

at 3d mark 06

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 19:49

Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2.3 Ghz
1 Gb Twinmos PC3200 ram (crappy timings)
Geforce 6800 GT @ 405/1050

2547 3dmarks
SM2 1124
SM3 1012
CPU 807

If you dont post similar to that, ie with specs i will not include your score in the table. I ahvent got the time to trawl through 3d mark links or sigs.

Thanks

TOm

welshtom · 18 Jan 2006 at 23:50

Jimbo Mahoney said:
Hey Tom! How's tricks?

good to see you in here

.

makes me sick seeing all this sli and dual core action

Tom

welshtom · 19 Jan 2006 at 00:04

you last 3 posters arent getting on the tables as i dont know what the hell your setups are?

Tom

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 09:51

im trying, i just put in about 40 entries.

only about 100 to go.

The new tables will be up tonight ok

Tom

ps lots of people arent going in on technicalities like no specs etc. If you have a high score and wanna get on the table, repost with your specs.(if you just edit your entry chances are it wont get seen)

ALSO I dont intend to delve through sigs to look for specs.
its taking long enough as it is. be nice to me!!!!

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 14:19

Lt_Col_Jack_ONe said:
WELSHTOM

I think we need proof of screen res aswell to prevent cheaters....... i.e screenie showing res or ORB link.

yea, its looking dubios on a few atm.

need a screenie then showing the 1280x1024

Tom

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 18:00

Tables updated

18:00 GMT

EDIT : IF you are having trouble seeing the new tables hit "ctrl + F5" , this is a forced refresh of the page so it will load the images from the server

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 18:31

kinggost said:
WHERE ARE THE TABLE MATE ON THIS WEBSITE OR ANOTHER

On the first page

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 19:02

kinggost said:
Cheers mate

If i get put on the list i get put just above gibbo might have to overclock soon

Well everyone who passed the criteria to get on the list got on the list (and even some others).

So obviously you missed out some key information.

Tom

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 20:16

kinggost said:
What did i need mate

Just repost your score and specs then it will go on with the next update.

Ps i dont like "specs in sig" comments

just a quick

Score = 3000
Specs : Athlon 64 3200 @ 2.3ghz, 7800gtx

Done

Tom

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 20:30

kinggost said:
Here we go mate just did it

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?projectType=14

Edit: Just noticed my graphic cards clocked at 526/1305 and i havnt even touched them they at stock so even better. They ment to be the xfx ee 490/1300

Link doesnt work.
And the reason they are higher is the delta that nvidia run. It adds a certain value to the clocks in 3d mode

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 20:31

lowrider007 said:
Alright mate, could you put mine in there as well, post no 275 /\, just would be nice to see a few more intel ones in there, cheers.

You specs are in your sig i guess? And i dont like guessing

welshtom · 20 Jan 2006 at 22:52

kinggost said:
Top 9 are deul core and in the top 10 the only 2 that arnt deul core is the optys that overclocked loads

wow that makes a lot of sense?? top 9 are dual core, yet there are 2 non dual cores in the top 10?

Opty 170 is dual core. the only one that isnt it number 10.

Tom

welshtom · 22 Jan 2006 at 12:54

this benchmark is not a good one in any shape or form for the current generation of games.

I dont think this benchmark will be valid until all newly released games are dual core compliant.

MY x1800xt gets beaten or matched by 7800gt's but in games it beats my 7800gtx.

3d mark 01 for the win i say.

Tom

welshtom · 23 Jan 2006 at 19:02

Firegod said:
Hey, many thanks for doing this btw welshtom... BUT, a few questions if you may to satisfy my curiosity...

1. (The most important) you missed my score out lol. Post #285 please.

2. Ok, not trying to cause an argument BUT how come "pastymuncher" is third with a score of 6015 when for example compared to me his CPU is slower and his 7800GT is only clocked ~20Mhz more on the core? Yet he has nearly two thousand more points? Is that a typo, as if you look at the scores equivalent they are all 7800GTX SLi rigs.

Cheers bud!

He's using 7800gt sli.

If your score is after the post where i said i'd updated the tables, it'll be in the next update. if its before my post, repost it

Tom