3D MARK 06 TOPLIST

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 19:27

3D MARK 06 TOPLIST - DO NOT USE

SINGLE-CORE/SLi

01.......4,070 | Shimmy | AMD FX-55 | 2 x 6800GT 256mb in SLi http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9666809
02.....
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10

SINGLE-CORE/SINGLE CARD

01.......4,506 | marc2003 | INTEL PENTIUM M 740 @ 2613mhz | x1950pro 512mb agp http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=942040
02.......4,448 | Phatboy | A64 3200+ @ 2500mhz | X1950 GT 512 @ 600/1552 | XP Pro http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2235862
03.......4,332 | Alex_6n2 | P4 Prescott [email protected] | x1950pro 512MB | XP Pro 32bit http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9877415
04.......1,377 | JayKay | AMD 3700+ @ 2.75ghz | n6600 128mb http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=9725528
05
06
07
08
09
10

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 20:32

snowdog said:
Tbh why fm only drivers, the best drivers for my card, 158.27, are not FM approved ( are WHQL though ) ?

Sorry mate..my bad. I meant WHQL

Soz

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 20:42

Sir Random said:
What about Quad-cores?

Quad section added

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 21:09

snowdog said:
Ehhh? I have a dual core pentium D @ 4 ghz, not a p4 @ 2.8 ghz, and a geforce 6800gs, not an 8800gts .

atleast give me 3minutes to fully update mate....I'm fast....but I ain't THAT fast

updated

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 21:15

Bizarre said:
Not sure if this counts as I don't own the card or the processor any longer.

3DMark Score 10767 3DMarks

I'd have listed your score bud, but the driver used wasn't WHQL

chaparral said:
Score: 12872 3DMarks Dual core C2D 6600 / single 8800gtx

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?projectType=14&projectId=2197325

link isn't valid mate

chaparral said:
I just done a rerun and got a little higher score then the 12,774 i had before (link should be working now...

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?projectType=14&projectId=2197325

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 21:31

updated guys...lemme know if I've went a bit Pete Tong

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 23:06

Bizarre said:
Ah OK mate, didn't realise the driver wasn't WHQL certified, nevermind, eh?

yeah bummer mate.....done it myself before

I'd like to allow it, a nice 10k+ AMD score, but sadly then I'd be inundated with "DAVE's Tweaked driver" runs of 19k+, lol

Good score all the same. Surely you can pull that still with your new rig no?

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 23:48

Tom|Nbk said:
2900 score here, this was done with the launch drivers o ill do another soon with 7.5 see if things have improved.

C2D @ 3.4Ghz 2900XT @ Stock

Nice one.
-------------------
Updated

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 12 Jun 2007 at 23:57

Fubar said:
This thread is a good idea, but the only image I get when I see the scores is a bunch of fellas walking up to a table with measurements up the side and them slapping there schlong onto it.

Am I sick?

Well your from Southport so........

Just kiddin' bud.

I prefer to think of it as place for people to check their system is running on par....considering 98% of guys have built or modded their own. For the guys with lots of money it can be a parade....and the guys with older hardware can feel left out...but it can work the other way for some of 'em. Like big rigs with low or below par scores. Categories help keep it competetive, or else most ppl would simply avoid the measuring table

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 13 Jun 2007 at 00:18

Bizarre said:
You know what it's like,

rgr that

fornowagain said:
How about some mention of the OS?. Vista kills the scores.

rgr that also.

Reality|Bites said:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=179987

Why not create a team like this

Someone needs to calculate the average score of the top 10.

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 13 Jun 2007 at 00:23

Greenboi said:
So far i think its 14244.625, if i worked it out correctly! (Im a mathtard )

lol, that'd put us in 12th going by that table.....maybe worth a shot

edit...

Since there are quite a lot of entries not WHQL certified, we'll have to go with the ANY driver rule...so long as the score isn't contested.

As for O.S info, I think it's a good idea. Can we all post with the following format please? Makes things much quicker

[C*OLOR=Yellow]80,000[/COLOR] | YOURNAME | INTEL E6600 @ 3560mhz | 8800GTX 768MB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=007

Copying this and inserting your own info is usually the quickest and easiest method.

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 13 Jun 2007 at 00:47

~TB~ said:
Score: 11,593 | ~TB~ | Dual core C2D 6600 @ 3.200 GHz | Vista 64 Bit | 8800GTX 768MB |

I've added you mate, I saw your page at the ORB. Somehow though I now have YOUR benchmark as one of mine under '06 :confused:

and your link is dead...to me atleast :confused:

wanna check it?

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 13 Jun 2007 at 00:53

~TB~ said:
Cheers

Probably just a glitch then..np

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 14 Jun 2007 at 15:13

ok, all updated.

There are however a lot of incorrect links posted. Aswell as people completely getting the wrong format. There's even a post where someone used someone elses link :confused:

by accident ofcourse, but nonetheless incorrect.

If your not on the list it's due to one of these reasons. Can we please stick to using this format....

[C*OLOR=Yellow]80,000[/COLOR] | YOURNAME | INTEL E6600 @ 9000mhz | 8800GTX 768MB | VISTA 32bit [url*]YOUR COMPARE LINK GOES HERE[/url]

(your compare link has the word COMPARE in it)

If people leave the ASTERISKS inplace then all I need do is remove them after checking their compare link

Makes my life easier, and the thread updates quicker as a result. I know it can be a pain but you each only have your own to do.....I have everyones sig to look through to build the table otherwise

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 15 Jun 2007 at 01:15

w3bbo said:
Many thanks

Thanx mate

Sir Random said:
[c*olor=Yellow]12,288[/color] | Sir Random | E6600 @ 3200Mhz | 8800GTX 768Mb @ 635/1000 | XP32bit | [url*]http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2199165[/URL]

Beautiful Sir, thanx

------------------------
Thanx to all who revised their posts.....very much appreciated also.
---------
updated

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 15 Jun 2007 at 09:50

IceShock said:
SOLDNER-MOFO64,

not going to upload mine? i followed your rules, plus the link has the "word compare" which you insisted on it having, so your not keeping the promise of posting results up which are by your rules

soz, musta missed you...sorted now

Flanno said:
Not bad for a Dell XPS running a quad at 3.2 but only using the multi. to overclock via the bios, no fsb increases here.

All you gotta do now is get a compare link and your on the list

------------------------
updated

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 15 Jun 2007 at 10:27

andyr said:
Latest score with baby quad and single gfx

jrodga2k5 said:
No screeny but ORB compare link for ya

nice one guys.

updated

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 15 Jun 2007 at 14:24

Clock.It said:
Need to do a bit of editing

You've lost me.......

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 16 Jun 2007 at 08:52

Massive Attack said:
someone check my score in my previous post please

Looks a little low to be honest for your rig stats. I score 6k with a single 7800GTX and a WINDSOR X2-3800 at 2520mhz.

It's upto you if you wanna do more runs, but I'll add this score if you submit it like the example provided

All updated guys

Some nice scores there.......nice to see ATi back on the scene

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 16 Jun 2007 at 11:49

Massive Attack said:
ok new drivers and 2000 piont increase

[C*OLOR=Yellow]8882[/COLOR] | Massive Attack | AMD X2 6000 @ 3000mhz | SLI 7900GS [url*]http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=007[/URL]

hmm doesnt seem to be wokrking

here is a printscreen anyway

http://img156.imageshack.us/my.php?image=untitledbk9.jpg

You need to copy your own compare link from the ORB into your post mate.

[C*OLOR=Yellow]8882[/COLOR] | Massive Attack | AMD X2 6000 @ 3000mhz | SLI 7900GS [url*]YOUR ORB COMPARE LINK GOES HERE[/url]

Nice boost too