3D Mark 2005 bench results, but with a difference

[FreeStream]

Now, we rarely ever play games without AA and AF + without the sliders being on Quality.

Now, why dont we use 3D Mark 2005 with quality settings and some AA and AF

Now as I understand it, ATi *should* pull ahead here, however SLi could bring it back


Settings:

• Both Sliders on Quality.
• AA = 4x
• AF = 8x Quality (NOT with Trilinear)
• Other AA/AF settings (Eg. Temporal AA for ATi - must be off)

You may be thinking whats the point? Well, it will show how each setup copes with AA and AF, this removes all (well, atleast most) CPU bottlenecking.


Ill go first: X1900XT @ 666/1602 (1.4/2.089) = 9356.

http://www.thunder-keep.co.uk/site/3dmark2005_aaandaf.jpg

Go get benching!!!

 

[FreeStream]

Ooh, it looked so purdy!



Rig in sig, X1900XT @ stock

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1850643 10732

EDIT - weird, I set 4x AA and 8x AF, but 3DMark doesn't seem to recognise it?

How did you beat me? lol you gotta set Direct X and OpenGl

Weird :S

 

[FreeStream]

So people keep telling me, but I'm much happier with it than I was with ATI Tray Tools.

What did you find wrong with ATT? Its quicker, simpler, uses less resorces.

CCC + ATi Tool doesnt mix either, esp with 2D/3D detection.

Conc