• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3D No glasses by Jonathan Post

I wonder how many calories you lose,it could be the first time you stuff your face with popcorn whilst watching a movie and lose weight lol.
I think i will stick with the glasses.
 
Gerard said:
Hard to say though i doubt it, possible he can just do that naturally and done this vid to get people wondering.
Click to expand...

nah no way that could be natural

It's either some SFX or those things he sticks on his temples are some kind high frequency electrodes that pulse electricity at 120hz to stimulate the eyelid muscles contract at 120hz.

that seems a little far fetched to me, I'm so confused :eek:
 
dan1903 said:
nah no way that could be natural

It's either some SFX or those things he sticks on his temples are some kind high frequency electrodes that pulse electricity at 120hz to stimulate the eyelid muscles contract at 120hz.

that seems a little far fetched to me, I'm so confused :eek:
Click to expand...

ITS NOT REAL. ITS BEEN DONE ON A COMPUTER. :p:D
 
You know, there's no reason 3d requires glasses. The filter can be at either end (or anywhere in the middle) of the passage of light. You can wear glasses, or you can put a filter over the screen. The binocular disparity is exactly the same as long as you still have two eyes, but this way around they can sell new tvs with glasses, rather than cheap filters that just pop over your current tv.

I hope I just get ignored as a wacko as i'm pretty sure this tech's been classified by the military.

As a side note, if you want the filter close to the screen, you need to display a lot more than 2 images. Tens of thousands in fact. Not all that hard to do though with fibre optics.
 
Last edited:
man_from_uncle said:
You know, there's no reason 3d requires glasses. The filter can be at either end (or anywhere in the middle) of the passage of light. You can wear glasses, or you can put a filter over the screen. The binocular disparity is exactly the same as long as you still have two eyes, but this way around they can sell new tvs with glasses, rather than cheap filters that just pop over your current tv.

I hope I just get ignored as a wacko as i'm pretty sure this tech's been classified by the military.

As a side note, if you want the filter close to the screen, you need to display a lot more than 2 images. Tens of thousands in fact. Not all that hard to do though with fibre optics.
Click to expand...

lol wut?

You know that the basis of any 3D-emulation is passing a different image to each eye, right? How, then, is that possible by putting a filter over the screen?

If you're talking about creating tens of thousands of different images, then that's hologram technology (the image displayed is different depending on your position relative to the image - a "true" 3D representation). That's still a LONG way away from viability. And what the hell would fibre optics have to do with anything?

Ignored as a wacko? Now why would you think that? :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom