3dmark on Radeon x1900

Chronictank

Chronictank

Chronictank

Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Posts
2,547
I got the following result when i ran the 3d mark

Is this a good result or a bad one?

When i ran the test, the last 2 videos seem to slow down to 4fps, is that normal?

I was looking through a few threads and people were posting scores into the 10,000's
thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
10,000 is with 3dmark 2003, not 2005. I get 17300 with 3dmark 2003. Burning a disc ATM so can't test 05. AMD 4400+, 2GB RAM, ATI X1900. What's your spec?
 
-AMD Opteron UP 165 Dual Core San Diego 1.8GHz 2MB Cache (Socket 939) - Retail (CP-151-AM)
-DFI LanParty UT NF4 Ultra-D (Socket 939) PCI-Express Motherboard (MB-014-DF)
-HIS Excalibur ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512MB GDDR3 AVIVO TV-Out/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail (GX-048-HT)
-Western Digital Raptor 74GB WD740GD 10,000RPM SATA 8MB Cache - OEM (HD-015-WD)
-G.Skill 2GB DDR HS PC3200 (2x1GB) CAS2.5 Dual Channel Kit (F1-3200USU2-2GBHS) (MY-007-GS)

opty only running at 1.81 as the cooler i ordered doesnt fit the mobo so am running on stock, i am still waiting on Zalman to reply on how to resolve the problem
 
Last edited:
Ok ran 3DMarsk 2005, I get 10440. Stock CPU (2.2ghz) and stock core/memory 621/720.

The last two are CPU tests only, the CPU is doing 3D in software. Mine are 2-6fps
 
ajgoodfellow said:
I was going to reply to say that you should look at about 10k for a stock X1900XT but seeing the huge boost in 3D Mark going from 1.8 to just under 2GHz then I'd say that it's about right and it's just rather CPU limited at the moment :)
Click to expand...

i was thinking that myself, get a better processor or a larger overclock will ease the cpu limitation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom