4.1ghz - on water
- Thread starter w3bbo
- Start date
Haha, thought that might have been too good to be true.
Is there any other decent program that you use to measure voltage, as i have queried this in the past. CPU-Z is the only one that gets close for me, but obviously for you it doesn't.
Is there any other decent program that you use to measure voltage, as i have queried this in the past. CPU-Z is the only one that gets close for me, but obviously for you it doesn't.
easyrider said:Orthos blend stable?
Thats what counts isn't it?
Changed your tune aint ya? Thought you swore by small FFT's for cpu stability testing
But yeah blend is what counts (1 round 11-12 hours) except when your doing suicide PI runs. As stated and quoted by you (why I don't know - trolling perhaps?) its a long way from stable atm and I aint claiming otherwise.
w3bbo said:Changed your tune aint ya? Thought you swore by small FFT's for cpu stability testing
But yeah blend is what counts (1 round 11-12 hours) except when your doing suicide PI runs. As stated and quoted by you (why I don't know - trolling perhaps?) its a long way from stable atm and I aint claiming otherwise.
No I was asking you if blend is the test to run.
I just dont see the point in posted a clock thats not orthos stable.
Thats all.
what does it prove?
That you can feed you cpu vcore and run PI?
If you want higher clocks go phase.
easyrider said:
If you don't see the point then why post unless you wish to troll? Something you are doing quite a lot lately.
I never stated this was stable, quite the opposite. It was done as a little challenge that is going on another forum. I have done orthos stable runs before as you know which dosn't makes the upgrade to phase look very appealing - backed up by the fact that you offered to sell me your phase last night lol!
It aint just a matter of feeding the cpu vcore as well you know(or do you?).
If I said that this was stable then I would expect to be shotdown and rightly so but I didn't, its a suicide PI run nothing more(even though it is also game stable) and the most I have gotten out of my 6600, thought some folk might be interested hence the post. So please stop your jealous baiting coz its quite sad to read.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 175
- Location
- Lowestoft
W3bbo, that is an awesome clock! You and your big-ass cube shaped monster rig are the inspiration for my own project - Goliath. I'm hoping it will be a rig big enough to fit in major water cooling. May I ask what blocks you use? Especially your NB? I did read it on a thread a few weeks ago but I'll be damned if I can find it now!
Keep up the good work mate!
Keep up the good work mate!
w3bbo said:
Jealous baiting?
Why would I be jealous?
Your thread title suggest you have 4.1ghz on water.
You dont really do you?
Its not stable.
So maybe 4.1ghz on water (not yet stable) would have been better.As the title suggest a successful clock.
I have my 6400 running at 4.2ghz with a maxed out mobo.
Don't know what I would get with a 9x multi.
I question your reasoning about clocking when you are the first one to demand orthos stabilty!
Thats rich.
Its not trolling I'm just asking why its suddenly ok for you to now post clocks that you admit are not stable.
Don't get so defensive.
I'm blocking you from msn as your attitude of late is appalling and just rude.
You can't take Criticism yourself but was first to pick up on my 3.8ghz clock on my 6400.
The fact you read msn messages and completely ignore them is also very arogant.And posting them on the forums is even more so.
Phase will get you stabilty @ 4.5ghz +
I have no intention of selling my phase at the moment and it was a joke.
You wanna lighten up mate..Cause overclocking should be fun not an anal exercise into suicide shots for epeen worship in the forums.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 175
- Location
- Lowestoft
Cheers W3bbo
easyrider said:
Because you couldn't do this with your old e6600 on water and instead spent money on phase and a new cpu that got you what 100mhz more? You feel threatened by anyone getting a decent clock and feel the need to belittle anyone and everyone who dosn't do things the 'easy' way. If anyone just took a read through the GPU forum recently would attest - if you don't have it then it simply aint no good
easyrider said:
How can I not have have that clockspeed - its there in the screeny! It isn't orthos stable, I never claimed it was orthos stable, infact the very first sentance of the origianl post said as much if you bothered to breath deep and put your brain into gear before putting your fingers in motion.
Yes you do - and you have yet to provide a 12 hour blend orthos run on that too and you are actually CLAIMING it to be stable, I am doing nothing of the sort - if I was I would post a 12 hours Blend orthos run (see sig)!easyrider said:
easyrider said:
I never 'demand' orthos stability - people will deem what they want to deem stable but when someone claims an overclock is stable and then fails to provide no indication of such I just ask for a screeny as this helps establish a good indication of stability. If they don't claim to have it stable then so be it - treat it as such. Aslong as someone dosn't claim something is stable when infact it is not then I can't see the problem.
I beg you please...don't block meeasyrider said:
easyrider said:
I never criticised lol I actually complimented so either learn to read or go see a psychologist. Heres a quote from your thread :
The starred out bit is G R 8 - hardly a criticism.w3bbo said:
It is a damn fine clock but if we are talking of hypocrisy then please take a moment and think before posting as it is YOU who demanded this whole orthos stability when we were talking on msn during my attempts to get 4ghz orthos stable. I presented a 12hr smallFFT test - which wasn't good enough as apperntly you wanted a 12hr BLEND test - which I also supplied. You on the otherhand have provided niether a full round of either test yet claim stability - please!
Its called being in the middle of a game or away from the PC - hence the 'away' icon. I also only really reply when someone has something interesting to say and dosn't constantly send nudges but types nothing. If it was a joke then why be offended that I post here, upset that maybe it aint as good as you are making out and the joke is actually on you?easyrider said:
easyrider said:
It is fun I agree hence why I was doing some suicide runs simply as a PI run on a separate forum to this - you have emphatically stated you have no interest in suicide shots and thats fine...so why continue to post in this thread? You kind Sir are trolling - be gone with you!
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 175
- Location
- Lowestoft
Here here. Go overclock some more guys, that's what we're here for!