4 years...:(

Caporegime
Joined
20 May 2007
Posts
41,217
Location
Surrey
So, i finally got round to getting Battlefield 3 and started playing the single player campaign. Now don't get me wrong, the graphics are fantastic but when I got to the bit where you are on the aircraft carrier (before getting into the jet) i just thought "where have i seen this before". My answer was ofcourse.. oh yes, 4 years ago in Crysis. I mean it looks almost exactly the same graphics wise.

"So what" i hear you say. Well, it just bugged me a bit that in 4 years, graphics don't seem to have moved on much, if at all. To be honest i think Battlefield 3 has Crysis beat in some areas of its tech/graphics but really, they are very similar in terms of graphics fidelity.

Now obviously this is very much down to the fact that in the console world, we still have consoles filled with 2005 technology.

Also, as a side note I read today that the longevity of this console generation is hurting retail stores as well:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15796585

"Analysts say High Street videogame retailers are struggling because of competition from stores on the internet and a lack of new hardware releases."


I guess i would really like to see some sort of effort from game developers to keep pushing graphics technology to the limit all the time rather than getting bogged down for 6-8 years or shorter gaps between new console hardware.

This is a bit of rambling thread with not a lot of point, but i hope some can relate :p

I think it's more about my shock at just how similar those two moments in both games looked!
 
Last edited:
I've got to agree actually, I played it when it was out and it's the first game in ages that I sat down and played start to end and loved every minute.

Great gameplay, story and cutscenes, and it certainly doesn't look bad by a long way. Where was it held back from being a great game by the console exactly?

who said it was?
 
lolwut?
the xbox gpu is very similar to the radeon 1900/x1950 but shares some similarities with the Radeon HD 2000/3000 Series....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenos_(graphics_chip)
whats amd upto now? 6000 series :p

face it the xbox gpu is based on 5year old technology and its whats holding back graphics in games

some of you are dreaming if you think crysis/hl2 look as good as modern games i suggest you replay them without mods

Crysis still holds up to them easily. As i explained in the OP in that Battlefield 3 carrier/jet mission the graphics look identical!
 
no they dont... the shaders and lighting in bf3 pees all over crysis
TxrDU.jpg

bf32011-10-2521-44-32-34.jpg


oh wait it looks exactly the same.....

That is quite possibly the worst screenshot of Crysis i have ever seen....:rolleyes:

I can't find any of the outside of the carrier on google images so thtas probably why you picked it :p

Inside though:

crysis64200808101509577ga8.jpg


crysis13_large.jpg


crysis_18_large.jpg


00013.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom