49" OLED Samsung G9 vs Philips 8900L

Associate
Joined
18 Jan 2006
Posts
180
Hi,
Having managed to convince myself that OLED is not going to immediately burn in and ruin my experience, I am now torn between the Samsung Odyssey G9 95SC on offer at £800 or the Philips Evnia 8900L on sale at £680. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate and HDMI 2.1, and it also has a flat stand, which would eliminate the need for an expensive monitor arm in my use case. The Evnia has "only" a 144hz refresh, HDMI 2.0 (but does have DP 1.4), annoying stand legs, but does have a burn-in warranty. It also has Ambiglow, which would match with my hue lights, and allow some bias lighting out of the box. I do currently have a hue play bar attached to the back of my current monitor to simulate this effect.

I'm currently running a 3080 and intend to upgrade to a 50 series in the new year. When I game, I mostly play single player rpgs and the like (Cyberpunk, Dragon Age, BG3, etc).

Am I cutting myself off with the lack of HDMI 2.1? Is the higher refresh rate actually going to improve my experience at all? Is there another alternative I should consider?

TIA
 
You can easily push beyond 144hz if you're upgrading to 50 series so G9 is a better upgrade choice in that scenario.

However as you mostly play single player games, got to decide if the extra 96hz is transformative enough for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom