4930k on RIVE; Additional Turbo Voltage question

Associate
Joined
2 Sep 2013
Posts
2,300
So I've been playing around with my setup a bit more lately, and I'm slowly narrowing the overclock down to an efficient (power consumption wise) level I believe. But I've got a tiny question over a Bios setting for this overclock setup that is stumping me, as I "believe" it would make the overclock use less power over time, but I can't really seem to get it going. So just want others opinion and ideas over this.

Quick system background:

4930k, 64GB 1600Mhz Corsair DDR3 RAM, Asus Rive (Latest official BIOS), Corsair 650W PSU, Corsair H100i (Original) cooling the CPU, all C states, etc on.

So normally, I rock this setup at 4.3Ghz (43 multiplier at 100bclk), with an offset voltage of -0.02v and also on a Medium LLC setting. This nets a drop of 0.02v across the board, whilst also dropping the max Turbo voltage another -0.02 via vdroop and the LLC compensating, so at load, it is using 1.27/1.28v (from VID of 1.311v). So this is the most efficient I can get the setup going normally I feel, any less voltage and the system falls over in prime95 (I know - I know, it's not a really great indicator of normal use when OC'd).

Now, I've tried pushing it to hit 4.5Ghz (45 multiplier at 100bclk), and found that the chip can hit 4.5Ghz stable in prime95 at 1.32v/1.33v (a far cry from the auto voltage of 1.4v). But in order to hit this with all the power saving on, I've only been able to use LLC on High (to have virtually 0 vdroop) and using an offset voltage of +0.02v (or an offset of +0.04v but with LLC at Medium). Which isn't a lot by a long shot, and looking at the meters, doesn't really chew that much more power up.

But I have noticed in the Asus RIVE Bios settings under CPU Performance Settings, there's a setting that's named "Additional Turbo Voltage" when you go from Auto to Enabled. Which is supposedly voltage that is added on when using the Turbo states only. I've tried my damnedest but I don't seem to be able to get this adding the voltage onto the offset when under full load (Turbo). It's not like the newer versions on other motherboards where you enter the desired voltage (1.33v), it's just an "additional" voltage I believe as I can't raise it beyond 1.0v, and it can't go less than 0v). However, CPUz never shows this additional voltage during testing, which is why I'm a bit stumped. I've tried putting in 0.02v to 0.06v, no change in CPUz core voltage during any testing).

Has anyone used this setting (Additional Turbo Voltage) on the Asus RIVE, and been able to get it going? Or has it been busted since the beginning and why it's not been talked about all this time?

Any ideas, help, or info appreciated.
 
I had a RIVE and then the RIVE BE, I believe they removed this option in the BE as I did not see again. I also overclocked using the offset method as you are doing but managed to get stability by having the LLC at high.
 
Thanks, so it's missing from the BE, but it's still on the normal RIVE. Did you ever use this specific setting back then?

I've been looking more into it, and from the two instances online I've read of someone else having this issue, it seems like the issue is more built into Windows 8.1/10 and one of it's updates where it is blocking the info or corrupting it somehow to let the BIOS/Motherboard and CPU know that they're in Turbo, and to apply the extra voltage during Turbo. So I think short of going back to Windows 7 where this didn't happen, or getting a new BIOS from Asus, I'll probably just have to keep it as you and I have OC'd it.

Incidentally, those reports with the Turbo and the Additional Turbo Voltage not working came about roughly when the BE came out, so I have a sneaky feeling Additional Turbo Voltage was removed precisely because of the update making it not work. A shame, would have loved to shave off a few more mVolts off whilst running. Ah well.

But of course, if anyone knows otherwise - on how to get it working again. Please do let me know. :)
 
No I never specifically used that setting back then so I can't tell you where I saw a difference or not. The RIVE was quite a popular board but a lot of those folks have since moved on and upgraded so you might struggle to get pertinent replies to a detail such as this. Might also be worth checking the ROG forum if you haven't done already.
 
Will drop by the ROG forums later when I have a bit more free time. Will see if anyone knows what's going on. Although, as you have said, high possibility it's going to be hard to get the answer with so many having migrated or upgraded.
 
Back
Top Bottom