Finally looking at retiring my old TV thats served well for the last 10 odd years and move into the world of OLED, Mini LED etc. I've heard good things about the A95K being effectively the standard for a TV. However, i'm aware of OLEDs suffering from burn in and looking at discussions on other forums and also websites such as rtings that this panel along with others in the Sony range suffer from some decent amounts of burn in, compared with the likes of the LG G3 and so forth.
Are these statements true and my worries valid? I'm looking at the display on a retailer that offers a 5 year warranty that includes burn in issues.. so just wondering if parting with that amount of money for the A95K vs the G3 for the same price or potentially a couple £ hundred less?
Not going to be using the TV as a monitor / gaming display. Casual TV usage / movies for a few hours a day. Little news watching or anything where static logos and tickers appear.. except F1 (timing screens and logo etc. ( so at most about 2 or 3 hours a day for a 20 odd weekends a year.)
Are these statements true and my worries valid? I'm looking at the display on a retailer that offers a 5 year warranty that includes burn in issues.. so just wondering if parting with that amount of money for the A95K vs the G3 for the same price or potentially a couple £ hundred less?
Not going to be using the TV as a monitor / gaming display. Casual TV usage / movies for a few hours a day. Little news watching or anything where static logos and tickers appear.. except F1 (timing screens and logo etc. ( so at most about 2 or 3 hours a day for a 20 odd weekends a year.)