55" Sony W809 - Flagship 1080p - £449 delivered

Very nice. Shame it is 1080p though.

no that isn't a shame. As any 4K at this price point would pale in terms of Picture Quality. Regardless of resolution.

Contrast levels, black levels, panel quality are much bigger factors than resolution.

The reason why when people buy PC monitors they don't just buy any panel with the highest res. TN for instant is regarded as being rubbish in terms of PQ but good for FPS gaming. IPS regarded as best for movies as is VA.
 
doesn't matter - 12 month warranty and some of them are new just damaged box, etc. this is like £300-£400 off the new price.

You do realise its a refeb not a new tv.

Refurbished models are products returned to Sony under the following circumstances: change of mind, faulty out of box, box damage or minor cosmetic imperfections. These products will be fully tested and repaired where necessary by an authorised repair centre. Whilst many of these products will be in as good as new condition, we cannot guarantee refurbished products sold will be delivered in the original packaging and may have minor cosmetic imperfections such as scratches, marks or discoloration. All refurbished products come with a minimum 12 months manufacturer's warranty.
 
Sorry but refurb and only 12 month warranty is a no no even if they are cheap.

how many tv's have you had fail after 12 months of use and within 5 years? what make and model were they?

apart from 2 retailers everybody else gives 12 month warranty. so i don't see the issue here. even if it was brand new it would still only have a 12 month warranty.

i luckily have a nationwide flex plus account gives me an additional 12 months warranty so I'll have 24 months.

still though any tv i've bought it's either been perfect and lasted 15 years plus or had issues from day one and was subsequently returned.

this is a flagship model it's not as if it's going to fall apart after 12 months.

anyway. i'll post pics of when it arrives to show everyone the condition. i'll also post an update after using it for a while.

if it isn't up to scratch i can easily return it.
 
I'd call it a good deal not really that great. How much better is this TV than the 55" Samsung H6400 that can be had for £649 with 6 years warranty?

first of all a lot of people see the 40" review on HDTV test then think wow the H6400 is amazing.

what you need to realise is. the 40" uses a different panel so it's not the same tv as the 55".

which is proven by the fact avforums reviewed the H6400 3 times.

https://www.avforums.com/review/samsung-h6400-ue32h6400-full-hd-led-lcd-3d-tv-review.10564

https://www.avforums.com/review/samsung-h6400-ue40h6400-tv-review.10825


https://www.avforums.com/review/samsung-h6400-ue55h6400-3d-led-lcd-tv-review.10295


so this tv

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/ue40h6400-201405023756.htm

isn't the same as the 55" H6400


so now we have that out of the way. this sony i believe uses the same panel as the W805C and W807C. But it's the W809C which has superior electronics and therefore better PQ than those two. I don't know all the specifics but motion flow is increased by 100hz from 900 to 1000 iirc. that's just what i can remember off the top of my head but there will likely be more than just that which is the difference.

so here are the w805 reviews (same panel slightly inferior electronics to the one i bought)

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/kdl55w805c-201508034145.htm

https://www.avforums.com/review/sony-kdl-55w805c-w805c-full-hd-1080p-android-tv-review.11817


black levels for one are far superior on the sony which is quite a big thing

sony Calibrated black level (4×4 ANSI) 0.025 cd/m2
samsung black level of 0.042 cd/m2


input lag again is also better

sony Input lag (high-speed camera) 21ms compared to lag-free CRT in [Game] mode
Leo Bodnar input lag tester 37ms in [Game] mode

samsung As it was, the H64000 has a lag to controller input of 40.6 milliseconds, which will be a fraction high for demanding online competitive gamers but will be fine for the average single player title.


"The Sony KDL-55W805C is largely a sideways move from last year’s W829 Bravia, but that’s no criticism of the former, because the latter has set quite a high bar as far as large-screen HDTVs go. Images on the W805C looked positively absorbing owing to deep blacks and wonderfully realistic colour palette (that’s able to saturate reds fully, unlike its predecessor), although 3D remained half-res (just like its predecessor).
The Sony W80C’s input lag was roughly one frame higher than the 2013 and 2014 Sony 1080p TVs, but for most owners this should still feel addictively fluid. Available at a street price of below £900 at time of publication, the KDL55W805 represents tremendous value for money when it comes to picture quality."

that is talking about the inferior model the W805 and that it being £900 representing tremendous value for money when it comes to PQ. so it's safe to assume the superior model the W809 for £449 represents ridiculous value for money.

at avforums they say the W805 is so good out of the box it's probably not worth paying for a pro calibrator.

"With only a 2- and 10-point white balance control available and no Colour Management System (CMS) it is a good job that the W805C is as accurate out-of-the-box, especially with a colour gamut that is only slightly out and can be massaged to produce a slightly more accurate result with the greyscale corrected and tracking better. We would have to question the need given the lack of adjustment available and the out-of-the-box image results for a full professional calibration. With only the greyscale controllable and assuming all W805C sets have similar gamut results, we would have to say that given the price point and end results likely with the Sony, a paid for calibration would probably be overkill and not really achieve massive before and after differences; provided the out-of-the-box settings are corrected for the room and lighting by the end user."


the 55" H6400 on the other hand

"Pre-calibration

In the out-of-the-box Movie settings there was a slight, but unmistakable, green tinge to the greyscale which resulted in white (and shades near white) having a mildly sickly look to them. Delta Errors averaged between 7 and 8 so we’ve definitely seen better unadjusted performance from a Samsung TV but, as expected, colours were generally very good at full saturation levels, especially in terms of the most important element - luminance."

you really need to spend £200-£300 on a pro calibration to get the best out of it. so add that onto the price and then you realise what a ridiculous deal this was.


the W805 really excels in bright rooms

"It is in the normal living room during day light or with good ambient lighting where the Sony KDL-W805C excels and produces some very nicely balanced and colourful images. Here we were impressed with the detail on offer and some decent motion with content such as football and HD documentaries on BBC4. You could apply Motionflow to sports or fast moving video content to improve the motion, but we would recommend avoiding its use with film or drama content. Black levels were strong and mixed contrast scenes held up well in the brighter viewing environment. Colours looked natural and skin tones were accurate throughout with the settings used out of the box and overall it was hard to find fault with the W805C when used in this manner. The downsides are more apparent in darker viewing situations."

Calibrated Performance


We have covered all the major picture points above and even after fixing the greyscale tracking to reference levels and slightly tweaking the gamut in the process, the differences between calibrated and out-of-the-box (given that the front panel controls for contrast etc. are set correctly for the environment) are negligible at best for the majority of users. This is certainly a case of the product probably achieving the best it can without the need for calibration; as it is best suited to being an everyday living room workhorse and not a cinematic critical viewing device. As such we don’t think it would be cost effective given the results and purchase price to go with a full professional paid for calibration on this model.


basically the sony excels in a bright room. the samsung more so in a darkened cinema style room (lights off, curtains closed) after being pro calibrated of course which the sony doesn't need.


also the 55" H6400 for £649 is store specific depending on stock you cannot buy online. i'm guessing there is probably zero stock anywhere or maybe they had some in 1 or 2 stores but probably sold out by now. elsewhere it's selling for a lot more and without anywhere near 6 years warranty.

it's £699 at argos with 3 year cover for an additional £120 as an example. then another £200-£300 for calibration. that's pushing 3 times what I paid :eek:


so yeah it was a great deal, imo better than the 1 or 2 that got the 55" H6400 for £649 with 6 year warranty.

this for me is a stop gap tv until i buy a 4k OLED.

bare in mind everything wrote above is for the inferior sony model the W809 is slightly better.

http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/tv-and...5w809cbu-smart-3d-55-led-tv-10132103-pdt.html

vs

http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/tv-and...5w807csu-smart-3d-55-led-tv-10132136-pdt.html
 
None, but I have had all three Sony TVs I've owned (two of which were Android ones) develop faults within a few months of purchase. Their build quality these days is shocking. My Samsung definitely looks better than the W805Cs I had, too.

kind of proves my point.

you usually get a fault straight away or none at all until it dies of old age. very rare to get one within 5 years.

you got unlucky. i've read plenty of posts on the official owners thread @ avforums and the majority haven't had any issues apart from android being sluggish.

were yours delivered by yodel by any chance?
 
Yes, but I don't think Yodel can be blamed for crap software issues and bugs, poor backlight uniformity etc. They were design/manufacturing faults, not physical damage issues.

software issues have been fixed but it's a mute point IMO

anyone who cares about such things owns a fire tv, android box, etc that they use for smart features.

https://www.avforums.com/threads/sony-2015-full-hd-2015-w80-75-70c.1937303/page-69

plenty of people in there with perfectly fine sony tv's and zero issues
 
https://www.avforums.com/threads/sony-2015-full-hd-2015-w80-75-70c.1937303/page-66#post-23211641

there is a guy who thinks all the sammy's are crap and sony's are better.

for every person saying sammy is better you will find another saying sony is.

IMO the best place to get an unbiased opinion are the reviews i linked to above. which all state the sony is better for bright rooms with daylight or ambient lighting. the samsung is better for darkly lit rooms (more cinema style orientation).

both are good but the sony doesn't need pro calibrated as it's really good out the box whereas the samsung benefits a lot from one and you should get it done.


as for smart features, i don't know anyone who doesn't have a android box or chrome cast, apple tv or fire tv, etc. even in my office where the average age is like 90 they all have android boxes they bought off ebay for £40.
 
Me.

Why would I need an extra box when my Samsung does netflix/amazon prime/youtube/iplayer/4od/fiveod and has 3 usb ports for media?

Chromecast feature is built in too.

And regards to pro calibration - I have an F8000 and I happy with it as is. Only a tiny fraction of people really care about super accurate colours. Most people are happy to tweak the settings themselves and are happy with the outcome.

because they don't receive updates very often or sometimes at all.

i know on my top of the range panny plasma it's received about 2-3 updates and is missing a lot of stuff.

the built in smart is crap compared to standalone, same goes for for the built in tuners. i don't use either of them i'd rather have a seperate freesat box and a separate freeview box.


they are good enough for basic use, but not if your hands on with tech
 
What's the outcome?

it arrived in mint condition. not in original packaging.

i've not set it up yet as i'll be moving home. so it's in storage waiting to be used.

the screen looked out of this world for the brief moment i took it out of the box and set it up. it then went back into the box.

for £449 it was definitely worth it.

couldn't see any problems with light bleed, etc which was the main worry.
 
I don't need to get it calibrated, it looks fine, and better than the two Sonys did. Not sure why you insist on suggesting I'm wrong about products I actually own(ed) myself but there we go.

As for the smart boxes, Netflix or Amazon or iPlayer on a Sony is identical to a Samsung or a Fire stick or Roku or PS4.

not according to the reviews on both hdtvtest and avforums. i think they know more about said tv's than yourself.

When it come to him, HE is only ever correct, thought people knew that already.

i'm copying and pasting direct from the reviews done by professional calibrators. so they are right not me.

for an extra £200

44% increase on price..................................................................................................

it's also a year older 2014 model. it's also not a flagship and benefits hugely from a pro calibration according to reviews whereas the same people say the sony doesn't.

so it's double the price 100% increase for the same quality of picture.
 
Are there any other stand out deals on here right now?

not really and i don't think there will be

http://centresdirect.co.uk/p-14496-kdl50w809cbua.aspx

50" of the same tv is £30 more expensive now. so i got 55" for £30 cheaper looks like a win/win in my book.

http://centresdirect.co.uk/p-14333-kdl55w807csua.aspx

55" of the model below mine for £100 more. albeit in the real world you wouldn't notice much difference if any. but it's £100 more.


what are you looking for exactly? the best time to buy tv's i'm afraid has most likely passed as all the new models are hitting stores and they have already cleared out last years models. you may get lucky if you keep scouring on a daily basis but the best time to buy is during the end of january to the middle of march. so february plus or minus 2 weeks either side. this is when shops clear out old models cheap to make way for new models.

maybe a shop store has forgotten to do so and you may get lucky but now it's best to wait for next year.

this is the 3rd time now i've bought during this period and i've gotten tv's for around half the going rate.

50" GT50 brand new with 5 year warranty and 2 sets of 3d glasses - £799 when it retailed for £1400 in the same store less than 9 months before.

51" D8000 brand new with 5 year warranty and 2 sets of 3d glasses for £649 when it retailed for £1600 in the same store less than 9 months before.

now I got the 55" W809C for £449 albeit "refurbished" with 12 month warranty when it retails in currys for around £729 atm (also a 12 month warranty). the w805c however (lesser model) retailed for around £900 last august. so you could say this tv was around £1K august last year.

what do i know though :D

http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sam...k-55-led-tv-639-applicanceelectronics-2417239

seems like an alright deal if your after 4k.

it's not a "highly recommended" award but one below

https://www.avforums.com/review/samsung-ue55ju6400-uhd-review.11288#sectionAnchor40389

so it's an 8/10 whereas all the tv's i've bought above are 9/10's iirc. may be wrong on the sammy plasma but i'm sure it was.
 
Back
Top Bottom