• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

5800X vs 1600..... for a laugh

humbug

humbug

humbug

Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
50,004
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
I'm in the middle of benchmarking a few games to see if there is any difference between Win 10 and Win 11 performance in games.

I remember Benchmarking Grid 2 on my Ryzen 1600 to measure the differences in performance with different RAM settings, i still have that slide, here is the comparison difference.

720P highest possible IQ settings, i do this to make sure the GPU never limits the CPU performance, it is that what we are after.

Ryzen 1600 with the best memory i could get:

Ryzen 1600, Avr FPS: 164.
Ryzen 5800X, Avr FPS: 299. :D

That's a performance increase of 82%.

KL0X7m5.png


mk6eUe0.png
 
I have been doing some equally silly things as I am running a 3080Ti on a Ryzen 4650, how sad is the life of a computer geek :D
 
sandys said:
I have been doing some equally silly things as I am running a 3080Ti on a Ryzen 4650, how sad is the life of a computer geek :D
Click to expand...
Reminds me of when I accidentally won an auction for a 4 month old Kepler Titan back in 2012 and had to pair it with a Sandy Bridge Pentium for about half a year :cry:
 
Never mind the CPU it was doing a creditable job, the little PSU on the otherhand said no and shutdown, 3080Ti too in efficient, still 4650 does OK, granted its no match for a 5950x but it plays games just fine

Result (3dmark.com)

Once you are at 4k the 4650 would be plenty as the GPU would still be a limiter.
 
Last edited:
It's not supprising it's a long way back to a 5800X, my X5670 @4.7ghz which would be 12 years old now used to virtually match the 1600 in cinebench R15 with a slight loss in ST but slight win in MT.

AMD have certainly brought Ryzen on since those days.
 
L3 and Latency differences between Win 11 build 22000.258 and 22000.282

WOW...

Build 22000.258

Build 22000.282, make no mistake here in build Build 22000.258 the L3 cache is measured in MB/s, in build 22000.282 its measured in GB/s

The System memory latency is 6.5% faster in the later build, the L3 Cache is 5X faster with the Latency 1/3 as low, these are huge differences, what did Microsoft do to F it up that much?

I'm going to make a more detailed post tomorrow.

xHwTt5F.png


FCgNCOq.png
 
Joxeon said:
@humbug is it just ryzen that's effected or are older Intel CPUs effected by this also?
Click to expand...

I installed w11 on my i7 8565 with 1050 and it seems down on 3dmark bences ~ 10% gpu and ~ 20% cpu, but I didn't have the foresight to bench before install and the last time I benched this laptop was pre spectre/meltdown patches, doh.
 
sandys said:
I installed w11 on my i7 8565 with 1050 and it seems down on 3dmark bences ~ 10% gpu and ~ 20% cpu, but I didn't have the foresight to bench before install and the last time I benched this laptop was pre spectre/meltdown patches, doh.
Click to expand...

Ouch :(
 
sandys said:
Looking at some of my win10 systems it would seem that the L3 is still not quite right, from 2400g, 2920 and 5950 nothing is much over 10ns.
Click to expand...

I tend to agree. Mine has always been much the same in Win10.

SY6uV5s.png


@humbug, did you install the latest AMD chipset drivers before running AIDA64 ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom