Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,341
- Location
- Planet Earth
The 5600x may be expensive per core, but it's probably the best value for money of all the AMD 5x line other than maybe the 5800x, most people who are gaming just don't need the additional cores.
In any case that wasn't my point, I'm just confused as to why there is such a deviance from MSRP for the 59xx chips. It's not like they can be used for mining, they're also not fantastic value for money. As you say, even content creators will see fantastic performance out of the 5800x, so I can't see where the pricing is coming from.
The Ryzen 9 CPUs probably use much better silicon quality chiplets. The Ryzen 7 5800X probably uses lower quality chiplets,and the Ryzen 5 5600X is a die salvage. If you look at the Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 9 5950X,the power consumption per chiplet looks to be lower,even though technically they do boost higher. I suspect the chiplets for the Ryzen 9 CPUs are also being stockpiled for Zen3 based Threadripper and Epyc CPUs.
Well if it's greed, I hope it's not the enthusiast community in general to blame. We seriously need to pull our heads out of our collective posteriors and start smelling the truth.
I'm getting concerned atm that the hate directed externally over GPU's and CPU's might not be entirely warranted.
Admittedly it could still be scalpers, but I expect them the get thrown under the bus soon, AMD has shown far more aptitude to stock the 5xxx CPUs than their GPU lines.
The community over the last 10 years did bring it on itself to some degree. Look what happened when Nvidia started making £1000 Titan GPUs,etc - within a generation £1000 GPUs were accepted.
Also the Zen3 CPUs use 80MM2 7NM chiplets and can sell from £280 upwards. A GPU uses much bigger 7NM chips,needs GDDR6,etc so AMD can make far more profits on Zen3 and its jacked up pricing.