776 ?

shadowscotland · 21 Jul 2006 at 15:18

Just got my second 776 but no information on it at stanford

p776_vln3.8nopbc - lets hope it's more like 761 or 772 and not like 773, been getting lots of sub 50 pointers

steps are at 8+ minute intervals at 50% on a P4 3.0 running two threads
edit: (13h+ to complete)

Indy500 · 21 Jul 2006 at 15:32

Yeah, 1 of my cores is on a 36 pointer right now, takes 8 hours to finish.

Stan_Lite · 21 Jul 2006 at 17:13

I've got one on my laptop (only rig I have access to at the moment).

Project : 776
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 36

-- Lisa --

Min. Time / Frame : 6mn 14s - 83.17 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 6mn 14s - 83.17 ppd

/Mutters profanities under breath :mad:

Stan

shadowscotland · 21 Jul 2006 at 17:32

Hey Stan, do all your threads have girls names?

And what happened to all the 2-300 WU (not that I ever got any)

Stan_Lite · 21 Jul 2006 at 18:24

shadowscotland said:
Hey Stan, do all your threads have girls names?

Nah. All my rigs are named after Simpsons characters

Stan

shadowscotland · 21 Jul 2006 at 18:30

good answer stan.

Just been checking round the office and I've got 9 threads doing 776, and 4 doing 761's and just for fun, the two slowest machines are doing 2125 (392p)
Typical

rich99million · 21 Jul 2006 at 18:31

Doh! (nicely timed eh?)

Didn't see this thread before - here's how mine are doing on these god-awful things

Project : 776
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 36

-- X2-Core0 --

Min. Time / Frame : 5mn 41s - 91.21 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 6mn 02s - 85.92 ppd

-- NewsI --

Min. Time / Frame : 6mn 06s - 84.98 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 6mn 06s - 84.98 ppd

my sub £100 newsmeister is only a few ppd behind half an X2 that cost the best part of £400 as an upgrade

still you know what they say.....

....every WU is sacred. every WU is great....

shadowscotland · 21 Jul 2006 at 18:42

all ways look on the bright side of life, fold-fold, fold-fold f-fold f-fold

Indy500 · 21 Jul 2006 at 20:08

I'm getting 106ppd.

lucifersam · 21 Jul 2006 at 22:32

great, i get my computer back into a state that it can fold and i am now on my third low pointer in a row! might have well not bothered! :rolleyes:

oceaness · 22 Jul 2006 at 00:14

Main rig went from a 761 (135 pointer) to a 41 pointer not it's on a 776 (36 pointer)

:eek:

it's gettng worse and worse

Trick · 22 Jul 2006 at 10:34

sr4470 said:
I'm getting 106ppd.

Yeah same here - the Bartons getting 104ppd with these 776s and it's only clocked at 1.8ghz. Strange that Rich's x2 is considerably less ppd...

rich99million · 22 Jul 2006 at 11:10

Trick said:
Yeah same here - the Bartons getting 104ppd with these 776s and it's only clocked at 1.8ghz. Strange that Rich's x2 is considerably less ppd...

hmmm odd indeed - though Core0 always seems to have a lower average ppd than Core1 on mine, must be the one that runs all the windows nonsense i guess

oceaness · 22 Jul 2006 at 11:32

Hey the 775's aren't as bad. 120 points and the 3000+ ClawHammer in my lappy is getting 124.77ppd

It's funny that the 2800+ has hit 180ppd at one point cause it had a good WU but my 3200+ has a highest of 126ppd on an awful 761 :rolleyes:

rich99million said:
hmmm odd indeed - though Core0 always seems to have a lower average ppd than Core1 on mine, must be the one that runs all the windows nonsense i guess

I thought windows was shared between both cores equally or is that only when idle?

rich99million · 22 Jul 2006 at 12:14

oceaness said:
I thought windows was shared between both cores equally or is that only when idle?

not totally sure - from looking through my benchmarks sometimes Core0 gets quite a bit higher ppd than Core1 so it must swap about from time to time, also no 2 WUs are the same anyway

Trick - I expect the better ppd on your Barton is due to higher RAM speeds or tighter timings maybe? My RAM is pretty slack so I can rule it out of any problems I may get with unstable Beta WUs

Trick · 22 Jul 2006 at 15:07

rich99million said:
Trick - I expect the better ppd on your Barton is due to higher RAM speeds or tighter timings maybe? My RAM is pretty slack so I can rule it out of any problems I may get with unstable Beta WUs

I'd assume that the case mate although the timings aren't great; off the top of my head I think they're cas 2.5,3,3,7. The athlon64 and the barton are currently living in a storage cupboard and don't get much fresh air in this heat. Currently the Barton is reading 68degs for the core and that's are stock speed. It used to run 2.3ghz 24/7 but I don't think it'd care for those speeds at the moment. The Althlon64 fairs better at 48degs running 2.6ghz - much better cooler. The opty is still happily crunching away at 2.8 24/7

Mikebert4 · 26 Jul 2006 at 07:42

oceaness said:
Main rig went from a 761 (135 pointer) to a 41 pointer not it's on a 776 (36 pointer)

it's gettng worse and worse

mines done the same... and scraping along at 82 ppd as well

still.. soon have my mini-machine farm up and crunching

lucifersam · 26 Jul 2006 at 10:25

my prescott giving 114ppd with a 776 not too bad i think, how much difference does tighter memory timings make?

shadowscotland · 26 Jul 2006 at 11:32

My OC'ed 805 if multi-crunching these - about 120ppd per core that's 240ppd on that rig (or 35% yesterday submitted WU's :eek:

)

verbal · 29 Jul 2006 at 18:55

Out of the 14 different types of WU i have had on my home box the 776 is the worst. I get 101ppd on my A64 @ 2200 the next worst is project 2051 where i get 113ppd.

Has anyone found a worse WU than this? Just asking cos i want to know what im going to get next... :rolleyes:

776 ?

Man of Honour

Man of Honour