• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

7900GTO Underperforming?

Margaret

Margaret

Margaret

Permabanned
Joined
15 Nov 2006
Posts
16,474
Or would you say this is about right?

8.4k on 3DMARK05 (Could use more tweaking on the card but this is the highest so far)

and this result from F.E.A.R Benchmark, all at Max, 2xFSAA and 16xAF, 1440x900 Res.

CLICK!

Still trying to push my OC further, seems a bit dodgy on ATI Tool.

Oh my system is:

Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2.2 Ghz
Geil Value PC3200 Dual Channel 4x512mb
Gigabyte K8NF-9 NF4 Mobo
MSI 7900GTO 512MB and it was at about 680/740 on this benchie.
 
I don't think that's too far out... mine did 9690 in 3DMark05 at stock speed, and that's with an Athlon64 3700 at 2.4GHz.

The fact that you have 4 memory modules as opposed to 2 might be making a difference as well, but I'm not sure.
 
RichDuffy said:
I don't think that's too far out... mine did 9690 in 3DMark05 at stock speed, and that's with an Athlon64 3700 at 2.4GHz.

The fact that you have 4 memory modules as opposed to 2 might be making a difference as well, but I'm not sure.
Click to expand...

Not sure on the memory idea as i got 4 x 512 also probably the same geil value stuff
 
Seems I got some configuring to do ;)

For some reason 3dMark likes to use my 2d Clock MHZ instead of 3d Clock, it's rather annoying, think it's a driver bug perhaps :eek:
 
bilston said:
That is way low in my opinion. I get 5500 odd at default clocks. Thats with a 2.6ghz Conroe.
Click to expand...
I think your Conroe makes all the difference. It's much faster than an A64 3000 at 2.2GHz. That'll account for quite a hefty difference in the stats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom