• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

7nm Process - Game changer?

EUV doesn't seem remotely viable or practical requiring "bits of tin" to generate the 13.5nm light. All the equipment has to operate in vacuum which sounds like an utter nightmare to avoid contamination and the light is near impossible to manipulate with lenses or mirrors. I doubt they'll ever get it to work.
 
PanMaster said:
EUV doesn't seem remotely viable or practical requiring "bits of tin" to generate the 13.5nm light. All the equipment has to operate in vacuum which sounds like an utter nightmare to avoid contamination and the light is near impossible to manipulate with lenses or mirrors. I doubt they'll ever get it to work.
Click to expand...

IBM seem pretty optimistic about it and are already looking at its use below 7nm. Sounds like there's been a lot of effort put into it over the last 10 years. Quite remarkable the about of time and money it takes to produce a CPU. Something I think most of us take for granted.
 
I think 7nm with any kind of advanced lithography is going to be expensive for a very long time.

It is potentially a game changer though for a lot of things especially in combination with some other advances it will make it possible to move away from monolithic cores in a way that isn't really possible currently for certain applications.
 
Rroff said:
I think 7nm with any kind of advanced lithography is going to be expensive for a very long time.

It is potentially a game changer though for a lot of things especially in combination with some other advances it will make it possible to move away from monolithic cores in a way that isn't really possible currently for certain applications.
Click to expand...

Is that because it is harder to produce small cores with the longer wavelengths?
 
Troezar said:
Is that because it is harder to produce small cores with the longer wavelengths?
Click to expand...

It affects the resolution of the individual pathways and details. The smaller the wavelength the smaller transistor you can make. With current wavelengths it's like etching a delicate pattern into wood with a butter knife. This wants to go back to using a scalpel.
 
Troezar said:
I was just reading this article about 7nm and EUV. Thought it might be of interest to the more nerdy of you ;)

https://www.pcgamesn.com/intel-amd-7nm-cpu-euv

Initial costs could be high but the use of 13.5nm light rather than 193nm could have a lot of benefits. I didn't realise that light below a wavelength of 193nm is absorbed by the air.
Click to expand...

Surely Graphene transistors is more of a game changer than making them smaller in current form ?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170613145144.htm

CPU's capable of terahertz instead of gigahertz is truly game changing, I think graphene will throw a spanner into Moores law
 
7nm will not change any games. The devs are still lazy slackers who just throw half baked rubbish up on early access so they don't have to pay proper beta testers
 
Jumper118 said:
7nm will not change any games. The devs are still lazy slackers who just throw half baked rubbish up on early access so they don't have to pay proper beta testers
Click to expand...

Perhaps a tad harsh. I see large corporations dictating what is produced with unrealistic deadlines and profits in mind. The independents are left with the scraps or crowd sourcing. Definitely developing the hard way.

This attitude permeates society in the west at the moment. It would be nice to see some pride in creating a good product without trying to screw every last penny out of the customers.
 
https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/amd_details_future_7nm_cpu_and_gpu_designs/1

15113259440l.png
 
itchy said:
Lucky if we see 5nm silicon.
Click to expand...

This... there is a significant chance that 7nm will be the last high power silicon node we see for commercial parts. While 5nm and 3nm are theoretically possible the questions of manufacturability (cost of fabs now seems to double for every node shrink) and performance benefit (leakage is serious problem at this geometry) leaves a question mark over the future of silicon because it might make more sense at that point to transition over to germanium or graphene.
 
IBM, GF and Samsung already have a 5nm GAAFET chip created using EUV so we seem to have a little more mileage left in silicon. 50% more transistors on a given area than 7nm.

After that though who knows...
 
Dr Lisa Su has been confident of the viability of 7nm. AMD pretty much need it to work out of the gate to stay competitive.
 
itchy said:
https://semiengineering.com/10nm-versus-7nm/

Food for thought. ;)
Click to expand...

Whatever happens there are going to have to be some major changes in the way they manufacturer chips in the next 10 years. Could be very interesting. I can see PCs lasting longer and longer though as the rate of improvement slows and the price creeps up. It's not like there are really any killer apps that are forcing people to upgrade their old tech.
 
Minusorange said:
Surely Graphene transistors is more of a game changer than making them smaller in current form ?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170613145144.htm

CPU's capable of terahertz instead of gigahertz is truly game changing, I think graphene will throw a spanner into Moores law
Click to expand...
How far does your signal propagate during a clock cycle at that kind of frequency? Not far at all! Fractions of current die sizes. You will have some interesting challenges keeping bits synchronised.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom