8 real cores vs 4 real & 4 threads for folding

Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
1,608
Location
Liverpool, England
What is better for folding? AMD Piledriver with 8 real cores or Intel 4 cores with 4 threads (ignoring power usage)?

On offer until end of today; AMD Piledriver FX-8 Eight Core 8350 Black Edition 4.00GHz (Socket AM3+) Processor - Retail
 
8350 vs 3770K? http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/551?vs=697

I would predict the 8350 is faster in folding. It's more than half the speed per thread, and you get twice as many threads.

As you say though it is less energy efficient, but is also cheaper to buy.
No, they both have eight threads. I predict exactly the opposite.
I would wait for Steamroller and see if AMD has reduced the power requirements closer to Intel's level.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom