I am considering buying an 80gb version. Do you think it's worth waiting for the 120GB version? Is it going to be the same console with just an updated HD?
I am considering buying an 80gb version. Do you think it's worth waiting for the 120GB version? Is it going to be the same console with just an updated HD?

From what i can tell the 80gig is identical to the 40gig just with a larger harddrive. The reason for this is probably because 80gig harddrives are now cheaper/the same price to manufacture as 40gigs, nothing to do with changing the core hardware, just cost cutting. The 160gig will be for people who want a larger harddrive but don't know how to change it themselves imo, people like my parents.
PS3 is built to be upgradeable. Thats why the warranty doesnt become void when you open it up.hmm...Good point. Maybe I should get a 40gb, I cant see changing the harddrive being hard. I mean I changed the hard drive in my original Xbox, and that wasnt meant to be donePS3 is built to be upgradeable. Thats why the warranty does become void when you open it up.
I may have a look around for a 60gb. I've not looked.
So if i go with an 80gb and a game, should I get GT5 or GRID?
80GB Core model draws less energy than 40GB
Looks like the 80GB Core PS3 may be more energy efficient than ever. A user at the Slickdeals forum connected his brand new 80GB Core system to a Kill-a-watt and discovered a slight energy savings. For example, the 40GB model used 155.2 watts when playing MGS4 -- the 80GB model used only 130 watts. The 40GB used 125.8 watts when idle on the XMB, while the 80GB used 111.9 watts. The popular theory is that Sony has secretly switched to new 65nm RSX chips: these are cheaper to manufacture, and are considered more reliable. Sony has not yet responded to these claims, but we wouldn't be surprised if each new SKU introduces new savings for the costly PS3 manufacturing process.
From PS3Fanboy
Vin.