Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Concorde Rules said:Hmm.
My XTX is 1k behind in 2005, 2k behind in 2006 and the XTX beats it in HL2 by 2 FPS at 1600x1200.
Other than that a 30-50% improvement.
Its reasonable but no reason to upgrade from a 7900/X1900 if your running at below 1600x1200.

isnt hl2 very favourable to ATI?
Concorde Rules said:Hmm.
My XTX is 1k behind in 2005, 2k behind in 2006 and the XTX beats it in HL2 by 2 FPS at 1600x1200.
Other than that a 30-50% improvement.
Its reasonable but no reason to upgrade from a 7900/X1900 if your running at below 1600x1200.
It looks great and even the FSAA and HDR works on this card!!
Burumbar said:Unless I'm missing something the 1950xtx is 3600 behind the 8800gtx in 3D06.
Those SLI figures are junk as well. 11k in 3D06 with SLIed GTX's? Looks like a typical Inquirer review tbh and they're not even using the N690 board are they?


The $6m Dan said:I guess you took one look at the link, saw it was the inquirer and didn't bother to read it.
Yes, they using an slightly older set-up, but they even admit that, and said a core 2 would likely score higher.
By using a different set-up each time you're hardly making fair comparisons with older cadrs are you?
Besides not every one has a core 2 system yet, so those Athlon 64 benchmarks are useful to some of us![]()
Burumbar said:Erm, yeah reading it was how I saw that the 8800gtx scored 3600 more marks than the XTX.