• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

8800gt vs 4890

Associate
Joined
27 Dec 2004
Posts
194
I'm trying to find a review comparing these cards - anyone know where to find one.
The xfx 4890 is up for £164.99 atm and i'm very tempted but want to confirm a good increase over the 8800gt i've got now. (gaming at 1650 x 1080).

thanks.
 
The difference would probably be in the region of 50-60% faster

Here this may help just found it.

gpushootout.jpg


gpushoot2.jpg


the resolution was 1280x1024

06-3dmark

8800GT
13,788 3dmarks
SM 2.0 5583
SM 3.0 5170
CPU 6459

8800GT Sli
22,170 3dmarks
SM 2.0 9336
SM 3.0 9601
CPU 6523

4890
19,144 3dmarks
SM 2.0 7188
SM 3.0 8547
CPU 6652

FurMark (all settings high, 8x MSAA)

8800gt
-min 13fps
-avg 15fps
-max 20fps

8800gt sli
-min 18fps
-avg 30fps
-max 40fps

4890
-min 25fps
-avg 31fps
-max 49fps


there are more but im not sure i can post the site link.. cant see any competitors though
 
Last edited:
thanks for the reply - i was hoping it would be close to double, guess i'll wait a bit longer, i do like to really notice the difference when i upgrade.

cheers.
 
Hmm looking at those charts the increase is 60 - 105% improvement.

Also the 4890 clock really well so would probable get you to 100% in a lot of games.

Tbh I can't see why the 60 - 105% improvement why you wouldn't notice the upgrade.

going from 30fps to over 50fps in most games is very noticable. You would even be able to switch on lots more eye candy and still run at better rates than you old 8800 GT.
 
If you really want a major boost, consider the 4890 Atomic/Black Edition. They're a little over £200 but will come with 1Ghz core as stock... which basically makes them faster than a GTX285 at stock, they're pretty pricey though, like all guaranteed overclock ones (but the atomic does come with 1Ghz/1040(4160) and a quieter, better cooler on top so some value there!). Depends on your cash allowance :)
Theres the 4870X2 for £250 atm too, which is basically 2 x 1gb 4870s bolted together, faster than your 8800GT by about 40-70% as standard 1 card model, but much faster in crossfire compatible games where both GPUs come into play (which apparently from people who own them is a majority these days).
 
Last edited:
I didnt know SLi 8800 GT still held up pretty well to be honest, i guess you get used to what you have after so many months/year+ and then want better. 4890 is indeed good for a single card, but myself i think ill wait for the new ones :)
 
If you really want a major boost, consider the 4890 Atomic/Black Edition. They're a little over £200 but will come with 1Ghz core as stock... which basically makes them faster than a GTX285 at stock, they're pretty pricey though, like all guaranteed overclock ones (but the atomic does come with 1Ghz/1040(4160) and a quieter, better cooler on top so some value there!). Depends on your cash allowance :)
Theres the 4870X2 for £250 atm too, which is basically 2 x 1gb 4870s bolted together, faster than your 8800GT by about 40-70% as standard 1 card model, but much faster in crossfire compatible games where both GPUs come into play (which apparently from people who own them is a majority these days).

I'm stuck with a budget of about £150.00 so the 4890 @ £164 fits about right. ive always liked the sound of sli or x2 but still read about problems though recently these seem fewer and fewer. i think my next motherboard will definately be crossfire/sli compatible though.
 
Man 8800GT SLI is pure ownage :eek:

At low resolutions yeah, at high res it begins to struggle a lot more heavily though due to limitations in the memory bandwidth etc. Once you hit 1920x1080 or higher you're much better off looking at the newer cards, as they aren't let down in the same way, and aren't held back.
 
Back
Top Bottom