8GB?

Putting a Ramdisk is just a waste of ram that could otherwise be assigned to a real task. Swapfile on ramdisk is even more pointless than a physical swapfile on the disk, as its rarely actually used, windows just uses the swapfile to create the virtual memory pool. Readyboost on a ramdisk is even more strange.

I did toy with the idea of getting an I-drive ones (one of those battery backup up memory disks), but in the end decided against it. Just have a good amount of physical ram, and leave the swapfile available so windows can give generous virtual memory pools to each application.

By using phyiscal ram for a ramdisk, your just increaseing the odds that ram will run out and the application will need to swap. Even if your swapfile is in ram, its still an extra process to swap it from the ramdisk ram, to the applications physical ram location.

Unless Im much mistaken the main point of readyboost is to decrease boot times. If your booting from an SSD, including readyboost on the same SSD wont help at all. If your readyboost is in a ramdrive, without a battery backup, it wont even be there on bootup so thats pretty pointless. The idea of readyboost, is if you have a regular hard drive, and a small SSD, windows can copy some of its more commonly used files to the SSD, to reduce boot times.

PS. 4GB -> 6GB also gives a noticeable improvement in performance For 64bit windows.
 
Last edited:
exactly, i've run with 8gb on my Vista box for 12mths or more.....since went back to 4gb for a little period w/out drama but i much prefer 8gb.

just threw a couple of the sammy SSD's into my main rig and so i went back to 8GB so i could run with readyboost + pagefile + temp files etc on a decent sized ramdisk....i find it quite easy to chew through 4GB under Vista also so that's another reason entirely.

i feel no desire to jump onto DDR3 just yet so at the current prices let's load up ;):p

How is your experience with SSD's? Worth the monies?
 
Back
Top Bottom