9/11 - Controlled demolition?

Concorde Rules said:
Hmm, the towers story is BS as its probably the air esaping from the center as it collapses and finding the easiest route out.


But the Pentagon one is interesting... was there any wreckage? I know my mind shouldn't be made up from one film but still, an aircraft wouldn't do that. Engines? Wings? Fuel? :confused: a 757 is quite big...

Oh well :(
Click to expand...


I agree in a way, there are certain things which dont add up in my mind, add that to the fact I distinctly remember on the news that day they showed fighter planes going up then that was never mentioned again, I also believe one plane might have been shot down. I was never convinced a plane even hit the pentagon, and nothing since that day has ever convinced me in the slightest about that.

Almost everyone will agree that all the events of that day are linked together, whoever did one was responsible for them all, its very unlikely each was a seperate incident which coincidently just happened on the same day. All we can do is keep an open mind about it and not rule anything out, I think its foolish to do otherwise.
 
e36Adz said:
You can see smoke from an explosion way below where they actual plane hit.
Click to expand...
And you know it's an explosion how? Do we see a flash or hear a bang in that 2 seconds of grainy, semi obscured video?

Nothing to do with the gallons and gallons of burning jet fuel that went gushing down stairwells, conduits and lift shafts after the force of a desintegrating 737 blew all the internal walls to matchwood then, no?

Jesus rollerskating Christ! Can we not get this thread closed.
 
Nelson said:
And you know it's an explosion how? Do we see a flash or hear a bang in that 2 seconds of grainy, semi obscured video?
Click to expand...

Well smoke normally does result after an explosion, so it wouldn't be too far fetched to call that an explosion, and there were plenty of 'bangs' heard by witnesses/reporters/firefighters who were all there, but they must all be lying hey? Ofcourse.
 
Ooh, ooh, ooh :D Almost forgot to say; explosions blow fires out. And one big enough to bring down the World Trade Center would certainly blow that fire out.

Source: Me. Because I used to work with pyrotechnics in special effects and to get a fireball you need a MIGHTY amount of fuel and a flame trigger after the explosion to light it back up again.
 
And lets not forget that Al Queda admitted they did it but don't let that get in the way of a good conspiracy.
If Al Queda really wanted to stir it up they could have denied it.
 
when they show in the video on youtube the floors below blowing, this was probably the explosion going down the stairwell and taking out the weaker doors as it went down.
 
Jonny69 said:
Ooh, ooh, ooh :D Almost forgot to say; explosions blow fires out. And one big enough to bring down the World Trade Center would certainly blow that fire out.

Source: Me. Because I used to work with pyrotechnics in special effects and to get a fireball you need a MIGHTY amount of fuel and a flame trigger after the explosion to light it back up again.
Click to expand...


I wanna be a pyromaniac, i mean pyrotechnic :(


How did you come across this job and what qualifications do you need to make things go bang? :D
 
dmpoole said:
And lets not forget that Al Queda admitted they did it but don't let that get in the way of a good conspiracy.
If Al Queda really wanted to stir it up they could have denied it.
Click to expand...
Bin Laden did deny the attacks - Source .

Although a later tape implicates Al-Q & Bin L, though some doubt its authenticity.

This whole fanning the flames of conspiracy is far too much like good fun.

Either way - It makes sense for Al Qaeda / Bin Laden to claim responsibility, whether they did it or not, as it the appearance of responsibility furthers their cause.
 
I think this video is really important, as it shows the Real cause of the twin trade collapse. It's easy to miss, but if you watch closely two planes fly into the buildings beforehand and then, they fall down...

Coincidence?
 
If you look carefully at the first video, 1min & 34secs in you can see Elvis & Lady Di parachuting from about the 68th floor.
 
Why was Arnie in that first vid?

Are they trying to say he done it or something?

I didnt watch it past that point by the way. I've seen that "Arnie Exposed" website, and its trying to say hes some part of some mad New World Order (based no no evidence whatsever aside from he went to a dinner party), and likes fondling women (which I fail to see a problem with, I like fondling women too). The vid lost all credibility at that point.

I've seen that "controlled demolition" crap before, and its simply caused by the pressure of the tons of concrete above the floors falling, and needing to find some place to blow out. Yes....it does do it at regular intervals, but then again, buildings are pretty regularly built things, and theres probably some weak spot at that point, that is built every set number of floors, that the pressure can escape through easily.
 
Last edited:
Le_Petit_Lapin said:
The ones that were flying past in the Hindenburg with JFK and Hitler waving out the window?
Click to expand...

OMG - I missed that as well.
I must try harder to concentrate on the FACTS and not make a conspiracy out of everything.
 
Werent the bomb sniffing dogs removed from the towers a week are something before the collapse, and didnt people working in the towers say that suspicious activity was happening on certain floors (floors blocked off etc)?

Ill try to find were i read/heard this...
 
Nelson said:
*to the tune of Big Ben

Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!
Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!

Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!
Wrong-wrong-wrong-wrong!

Yer-wrong!

Yer-wrong!

Yer-wrong!

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Scrubs? :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom